04.26.2014

In his book Parallel Worlds,
physicist Michio Kaku says:

*"…the visible matter we see around us
(including the mountains, planets, stars and galaxies) makes up a paltry 4
percent of the total matter and energy content of the universe. (Of that 4
percent, most of it is in the form of hydrogen and helium, and probably only
0.03 percent takes the form of the heavy elements). Most of the universe is
actually made of mysterious, invisible material of totally unknown origin. The
familiar elements that make up our world constitute only 0.03 percent of the
universe. In some sense, science is being thrown back centuries into the past,
before the rise of the atomic hypothesis, as physicists grapple with the fact
that the universe is dominated by new, unknown forms of matter and energy…23
percent of the universe is made of a strange, undetermined substance called
dark matter, which has weight, surrounds the galaxies in a gigantic halo, but
is totally invisible…. it bends starlight, just like glass, and hence can be
located by the amount of optical distortion it creates.*

* *

*No one at the present time has any
understanding of where this 'energy of nothing' comes from. 'Frankly, we just
don't understand it. We know what its effects are [but] we're completely
clueless…everybody's clueless about it,' admits Craig Hogan, an astronomer at
the University of Washington at Seattle.*

* *

*If we take the latest theory of
subatomic particles and try to compute the value of this dark energy, we find a
number that is off by 10120 (that's the number 1 followed by 120 zeros). This
discrepancy between theory and experiment is far and away the largest gap ever
found in the history of science. It is one of our greatest embarrassments - our
best theory cannot calculate the value of the largest source of energy in the
entire universe. Surely, there is a shelf full of Nobel Prizes for the
enterprising individuals who can unravel the mystery of dark matter and dark
energy."*

There you have it, direct from the
mouth of a leading physicist: science is completely baffled by the composition
of 96 percent of the universe!

What we "know" has shrunk to a
miserable 4 percent. Not so long ago, scientists thought that the so-called
"standard model" of particle physics was in the process of explaining
all of the contents of the cosmos. Now it explains close to nothing.

If you got
4 percent in a physics exam, it would be deemed a hopeless failure, showing
that you knew next to nothing about the subject. Yet we still hear the old
drumbeat that physicists are on the verge of producing a Grand Unified Theory
of Everything. Dream on! Scientists haven't even completed task one yet -
defining the appropriate framework for the problem.

In a previous article, we asked
how many dimensions the cosmos has; how many it needs to be complete. No
scientist has ever asked this basic question. For centuries, they all simply
assumed that there were three of space and one of time, and that these were
absolute i.e. had independent existence even if there were no objects in the
universe. This is the entire basis of the enormously successful Newtonian
physics that dominated Western scientific thinking until the advent of
electromagnetism, relativity and quantum mechanics.

The only person who dared to
challenge the Newtonian orthodoxy was the brilliant Illuminatus Leibniz, who
described space and time in relational terms. Without any objects in the
universe, Leibniz argued, space and time would not exist i.e. they are not
mysterious substances but simply ways of describing relations between objects.
If someone says that he is sitting in the same seat that he was occupying ten
minutes ago he is describing his current space and time coordinates in relation
to his previous space and time coordinates. No one ever provides absolute space
and time coordinates. How would you even begin? Does the universe have a
perfect cosmic clock that has been ticking since the beginning of time that
someone can consult? Is there a perfect cosmic map with a dead centre that
someone can use to identify their absolute spatial location?

With Einstein came the realisation
that space and time were fused together in 4-dimensional spacetime. Even now,
virtually no one comprehends the sheer scale of the revolution ushered in by
Einstein. Some scientists still assert that Einsteinian physics is merely a
development of Newtonian physics. Only people with no grasp of philosophy could
make such a stupid statement. Einstein's theories represent an irrevocable
break with the conceptual underpinning of Newtonian physics. As Einstein
himself recognized, his ideas fall firmly into the relational Leibnizian camp.

Yet still we talk of 4 dimensions.
Why 4? Why not any other number? Why not the 11 of M-theory? What is the
theoretical basis of any calculation of the number of dimensions the universe
must have? No scientist has ever had a clue.

So, we received from some brave
souls the following answers to our question: 0, 1, 5, 8, 10 and infinity. There
were various reasons given for these guesses, but there was a common theme that
led people to guess the numbers they did. They were seeking a number that was
"right" in terms of some principle of beauty, elegance, mystical
suitability, or some inherent quality of the number itself that raised it above
other numbers.

Pythagoras himself started off
using exactly this type of thinking. Consider the following remarks by
mathematician Marcus du Sautoy in his book The Music of the Primes:

*"The origins of
mathematicians' interest in this infinite sum came from music and went back to
a discovery made by the Greeks. Pythagoras was the first to discover the
fundamental connection between mathematics and music. He filled an urn with
water and banged it with a hammer to produce a note. If he removed half the
water and banged the urn again, the note had gone up an octave. Each time he
removed more water to leave the urn one-third full, then one-quarter full, the
notes produced would sound to his ear in harmony with the first note he'd
played. Any other notes which were created by removing some other amount of
water sounded in dissonance with that original note. There was some audible
beauty associated with these fractions. The harmony that Pythagoras had
discovered in the numbers 1, ½, 1/3, ¼…made him believe that the whole universe
was controlled by music, which is why he coined the expression 'the music of
the spheres.'*

* *

*"…Ever since Pythagoras'
discovery of an arithmetic connection between mathematics and music, people
have compared both the aesthetic and the physical traits shared by the two
disciplines…As Pythagoras discovered, it is not just in the aesthetic realm
that mathematics and music overlap. The very physics of music has at its root
the basis of mathematics. If you blow across the top of a bottle you hear a
note. By blowing a little harder, and with a little skill, you can start to
hear higher notes - the extra harmonics, the overtones. When a musician plays a
note on an instrument they are producing an infinity of additional harmonics,
just as you do when you blow across the top of the bottle. These additional
harmonics help to give each instrument its own distinctive sound. The physical
characteristics of each instrument mean that we hear different combinations of
harmonics. In addition to the fundamental note, the clarinet plays only those
harmonies produced by odd fractions: 1/3, 1/5, 1/7,…The string of a violin, on
the other hand, vibrates to create all the harmonics that Pythagoras produced
with his urn - those corresponding to the fractions ½, 1/3, ¼,…*

* *

*"Since the sound of a
vibrating violin string is the infinite sum of the fundamental note and all the
possible harmonics, mathematicians became intrigued by the mathematical
analogue. The infinite sum 1 + ½ + 1/3 + ¼… became known as the harmonic
series." *

As Du Sautoy indicates, Pythagoras
was in thrall to the relationship between music and mathematics. It made
perfect aesthetic sense to Pythagoras that the universe should be of the nature
of some majestic symphony by the Supreme Composer. How elegant, how beautiful,
how right. Indeed how could it possibly be otherwise? Music represented order
and harmony, the organization of chaos into something glorious and inspiring,
something inherently beautiful that could fill humanity's souls with the most
divine of feelings, that could raise their gaze to higher things.

*"Mathematics and music are God's languages. When you speak
them...you're speaking directly to God."*

Rebecca Goldstein

So, the Illuminati became the
first true students of music, and they sought to understand the Divine Mind as
that of a cosmic musician who composed the finest melodies and harmonies, who
provided perfect songs for soloists, choirs, orchestras, and the Dionysian
Chorus that gave musical form to the great tales of Greek tragedy.

Pythagoras taught that the cosmos
obeyed a mathematical law called Harmony, which ensured right relations between
everything. The essence of harmony is that harmonious numbers can be written as
ratios: 1/2, 3/2, 4/3 etc. Such numbers are literally rational. What could be
more natural than that the cosmos was rational and harmonious, full of right
proportion?

And then Pythagoras made a
shattering discovery. Using his own famous theorem that in a right-angled
triangle the square on the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares on the
other two sides, he calculated what the hypotenuse would be for a right-angled
triangle with sides one unit long and got the answer √2. No matter how hard he
tried, he could not express the hypotenuse in this case as being in harmonious
ratio with its sides. In a "3,4,5" triangle, the ratio of the
respective sides to the hypotenuse could be written as 3/5 and 4/5. But what
about 1/√2? Ugly, unacceptable! √2 wasn't any kind of harmonious number.
Instantly, the whole edifice of Harmony collapsed. There were patterns in the
world that weren't rational i.e. capable of being expressed in terms of ratios.
They were irrational.

It was to resolve this crisis that
Pythagoras devised one of the most profound and powerful ideas of all time: the
Completeness Theorem.

This said that Harmony was but a
subset of Completeness, hence not the full truth of the cosmos. Only
mathematical completeness could reflect the essence of the cosmos. After all,
how could incompleteness ever suffice? By definition, it would always be
incomplete. The cosmos must be complete in a mathematical sense. If it were
incomplete, the cosmos would be unstable. Inexplicable oddities, arising from
the incompleteness, would abound. It would be impossible to analyze these. The
cosmos would be a bizarre mixture of things that made complete sense and other
things that were completely baffling. Nothing would be predictable because
incompleteness might rear its end at any instant.

Pythagoras's Completeness Theorem
was dialectically refined over the years. It is now expressed in the following
terms:

1) The cosmos prefers no number
over another. It does not exclude any number or discriminate against any
number. To say that any number is "forbidden" by nature is absurd.
Any theory based on anything less than the full set of numbers is by definition
incomplete. Any such theory cannot properly describe the cosmos. Science,
because it excludes zero and infinity, is formally incomplete and can only be
complete once it embraces these two numbers.

2) All numbers are in fact
infinite. The number 1 may seem to be finite, but it can be written as 1.0
followed by an infinite numbers of zeroes. All irrational numbers are infinite
and all rational numbers can be written in infinite form (just as we
illustrated with 1). Therefore the entire cosmos can be mapped with infinite
exactitude. There are no gaps anywhere in the cosmos described by the full set
of numbers, and every number is infinitely precise. Nothing can exist outside
the full set of numbers. There is no room for anything else. Only the full set
of numbers allows a full description of existence.

Imagine if there were a full set
of numbers between 1.0 and 1.4 and between 1.5 and 2.0. What about the gap
between 1.4 and 1.5? Imagine there were no numbers there - just an empty space.
This would mean that anything that was smoothly flowing between 1.0 to 1.4
would come to a complete stop at 1.4. How would it bridge the mysterious gap to
1.5? In this little gap, the rules of the cosmos would be completely different.
Physics would operate differently. Nature would operate differently. Calculus,
the most important technique in physics and mathematics, would fail. Calculus
is based on reducing the distance between two points to zero, and this is only
possible because there's an infinitely small gap between any two adjacent
points designated by infinitely precise numbers.

If there were gaps between any numbers or they weren't all
infinitely precise, calculus wouldn't work. Mathematical functions would break
down. It wouldn't be valid to draw a line between two points if there was a
mathematical lacuna between them. The cosmos would be unstable and would unravel.

3) The cosmos must be stable,
hence numbers must provide a rock-solid platform. This means that no matter
what mathematical operation is performed on them, they must resist instability.
The full set of numbers must be stable under any global mathematical operation
performed upon them, whether it be rotation, inversion, addition, subtraction,
multiplication, division, raising them to a power, taking the mirror image etc.
If any mathematical operation performed on an apparently full set of numbers
resulted in something catastrophic then it would be proof that the proposed
full set of numbers was in fact incomplete.

4) Nothing can exist outside
"complete" mathematics. All possibilities are accommodated. There is
nothing else. Complete mathematics specifies everything. Any theory that does
not use complete mathematics is incomplete and cannot offer a full description
of everything. Only complete mathematics provides the framework for a Grand
Unified Theory of Everything. Once completeness has been established, nothing
can exist outside it. Everything that is knowable is contained within the
system. Everything that exists is contained within the system.

5) To establish a Grand Unified
Theory of Everything, the first task that must be accomplished is to describe
the complete mathematics upon which it will be based. This is a task for
mathematical logic, not for scientific experiments. No physicist, or indeed
modern mathematician, has ever addressed the issue of complete mathematics.

6) The single most important
aspect of complete mathematics is the question of dimensionality. How many
dimensions are required to accommodate all conceivable numbers, to a depth of
infinity, so that not a single point anywhere cannot be mapped to a unique
number of infinite precision? Only once the issue of dimensionality has been
definitively resolved can any Grand Unified Theory of Everything be
constructed. M-theory, science's latest attempt at a Grand Unified Theory is
based on 11 dimensions, but there is absolutely no theoretical basis for this
number, hence M-theory, which remains a "work in progress" is certain
to collapse in due course.

Humanity has always wanted to know
everything, to peer into every dark corner of the cosmos, to resolve every
riddle, paradox and mystery. Pythagoras's Completeness Theorem, based on
defining mathematical completeness, is the foundation of Absolute Knowledge.
The Completeness Theorem asserts that it is impossible for anything to exist
outwith the framework of complete mathematics. Everything that can happen will
happen in terms of complete mathematics, and nothing else. Anything that is not
forbidden by complete mathematics is compulsory. There are no mysterious forces
outside complete mathematics. Nothing can exist outwith complete mathematics.
God himself can't escape complete mathematics, despite what the Abrahamists
say. When Pythagoras declared, "All is number", this was his
reference to his Completeness Theorem.

Mathematics specifies all that can
exist, every form that the arche can take. There is quite simply nothing else.
And, because human beings understand numbers, they can therefore understand the
cosmos. As above, so below. Every corner of the cosmos obeys exactly the same
mathematical laws. Any mind that grasps complete mathematics grasps everything.
At that point, when you truly understand complete mathematics and all of its
implications, you are capable of achieving gnosis and entering into union with
the Divine Mind. But gnosis isn't just the "scientific" grasp of complete
mathematics, it's also to feel it, to BE IT.

Imagine providing a perfect
mathematical description of Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata in terms of a
combination of basic sine waves. You have accomplished the scientific task. You
have broken down all of the apparent complexity into something simple. You have
understood how these sounds are assembled. You have measured their shape,
frequency, wavelength, amplitude, pattern. You have understood so much. Yet at
no point have you felt it. It is when you have tears in your eyes as you listen
to the music that you have achieved gnosis regarding that piece of music. You
are no longer looking at the music from outside. You are inside it. You are it.
It reflects your will. It is your soul singing. Gnosis is about knowing the cosmos
from inside and outside.

We can give you the
"outside" perspective. But you must provide the inside perspective
for yourself. Only you can. No one can do it on your behalf. You must
internalise it. You must feel it. You must become one with the cosmos, feeling
every part of it, sensing every part of it, comprehending every part. And then
you are Abraxas. You have become God. Literally.

Plato asserted that what appears
as "learning" is in fact "remembering". The soul, before it
became incarnate in the body, existed in the realm of Ideas where it was
surrounded by the perfect "Forms" i.e. by the contents of Absolute
Knowledge in Plato's view. In this domain, the soul perceived everything as it
truly is rather than as the pale copy or shadow of truth that we encounter in
the mortal world of imperfection. The right questions can draw out this latent,
forgotten knowledge of Absolute Truth. We are already imbued with everything we
need to know but our mortality has obscured it, has transformed the perfect
originals into inaccurate copies and simulacra that present only a distorted
version of reality.

Human beings are already the
embodiment of complete mathematics. We are written in mathematics. We don't
need to be expert mathematicians in any conscious sense in order to have an
intuitive grasp of mathematics. For most of us, our consciousness gets in the
way of our grasp of mathematics. Like Plato's souls, we become confused in the
world of space and time. Yet every time we catch a ball, we are carrying out an
extremely complex mathematical operation that most of us wouldn't have the
vaguest idea how to describe in mathematical equations. We just "do
it" - we don't think about it. It is internalised, intuitive, and we have
a supreme grasp of it. Autistic savants can perform mathematical wonders faster
than computers without having the vaguest idea of what they are doing. The
answer just leaps out at them. How? From where? They are like Platonic souls
hardwired into the perfect Mathematical Forms. They "see" mathematics
without understanding it consciously. They don't need to.

Most people love music and it is
when they are listening to their favourite songs that they come closest to
appreciating mathematics. Music is audible mathematics. Schopenhauer described
music as a copy of the cosmic will. It moves us so much because it is actually
tuning us into the pulse of the dialectic itself, of the teleological desire to
grow, to strive, to develop, to go forward, to revel in the life force.
(Schopenhauer is absolutely right: music is mathematical, just as the cosmic
will is.)

So, don't imagine that you have to
be a mathematical genius to "get it". Everyone gets it one way or
another. It's built in. We can access it intuitively. We are all autistic
savants in this regard, if we did but know it. We just need to dig deeper to
reveal that side of our inner selves.

Listen to music. Relax. Have some
wine (or another drug of your choice). Think of numbers, shapes, patterns,
geometrical figures. Imagine yourself walking through a Platonic domain of
perfect squares, triangles, circles, hyperbolas, parabolas, cubes, spheres,
cylinders, enormous numbers, some clear as glass, some in the colours of the
rainbow, some glowing, some translucent, some flashing. Imagine yourself in a
rowing boat on a fast-flowing river of numbers. In a strong wind of numbers.
Standing atop a mountain of numbers.

You are immersed in an ocean of
numbers. Numbers are imprinted on everything. Existence as we know it consists
of formlessness and form fused together. Minded energy provides the formless
part, and mathematics the form. The interaction between the arche and
mathematics is so close, so intimate, that it becomes impossible to say where
one ends and the other begins. So, mathematics can be validly identified with
the arche, in accordance with Pythagoras's inspired insight. The arche might be
called mathematical energy, the mathematical part taking the role of elementary
mind, from which human minds, with human consciousness, ultimately emerged.

The universe is made of formless
energy sculpted into form by mathematics. Mathematics is Pygmalion sculpting
his perfect woman - Galatea - and then bringing her to life by imbuing her with
mind and consciousness. Life, mind and consciousness are mathematical in
origin. Eternal life is made possible by mathematics. Souls are mathematical
entities. God is the apex of mathematical possibility. God is the Monad, the
Whole, the One: the cosmos alive, conscious, and free to do absolutely anything
it wishes.

Mathematics at some level is
alive, and it is trying to solve its own cosmic equation. The force that keeps
it going is the dialectic. Mathematics is like an enormous computer that will
never stop calculating until it has provided the answer to "life, the
universe, and everything." The amusing answer, provided by Douglas Adams
in the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, is "42". The real answer is
Abraxas. God is the final mathematical solution of the cosmos.

Adams made the fascinating
suggestion that the ultimate question of life was being constructed via a
planetary computer/mind: Earth. In fact, both the question and the answer are
provided not by a planet but by the cosmos itself. The ultimate question is:
"What is the maximum potential of existence?" The answer is God. The
cosmos evolves from maximum potential to maximum expression of that potential.

Every human being grows from a
fertilized egg to a baby to a youth to an adult - from potential to
actualization. The supreme human lives are those in which the adults squeeze
out every last drop of their potential in concrete and glorious achievements
that dazzle the world. Are you making the most of your potential? Are you
turning it from lead into gold? Are you an alchemist, or one of the unenlightened
on your knees to a fake God? Abrahamism destroys potential; Illuminism and
meritocracy are all about transforming all human potential into golden
achievements. Earth will become a 24-carat golden nugget, the supreme treasure
of the universe.

*"There is naught in heaven or upon earth that is not in man. And
God who dwelleth in Heaven, He also is in Man."*

Paracelsus

The
Illuminati want to release human divinity. That is the Great Work - the magnum
opus - of which the alchemists spoke.

* * * * *

*"Everything of any importance is founded on mathematics."*

--Robert
Heinlein

The
following diagram is one of the most important you will ever see:

It contains seven of the nine most
significant numbers. 1, -1, i, -i, and 0 are plainly visible. The circle contains
the number pi and the circle is a symbol of the number infinity. The absent
numbers are e (the base of natural logarithms and from which the exponential
function is obtained) and the golden ratio (phi).

(Many mathematicians consider
Euler's formula as the most beautiful in mathematics eiπ + 1 = 0 because it
expresses a relationship between five of the most crucial numbers in a
supremely elegant and compact manner.)

Consider how the diagram is
constructed:

1) It begins with zero, the
origin, a dimensionless point. Extend that dimensionless point to the east to
make a one-dimensional line of positive numbers. Extend it to the west to cater
for negative numbers. The positive and negative numbers make up the so-called
"real" number line. Why aren't the real numbers complete? Because if
we perform the mathematical operation of squaring the real numbers, half of the
universe vanishes since all of the negatives become positive. There is a
catastrophic flaw in the real numbers. How is this remedied?

2) We extend zero to the north to
make a one-dimensional line of positive imaginary numbers, and we extend it to
the south to make a one-dimensional line of negative imaginary numbers. We have
gone from a one-dimensional line of real numbers to a two-dimensional plane of
complex numbers (complex numbers comprise a real part and an imaginary part).
Now what happens when we square this universe? The negative real numbers
disappear as before, but now they are replaced by the squared imaginary numbers
since the square of an imaginary number is negative. But if the imaginary
numbers have become real negative numbers, what takes the place of the
imaginary numbers? Haven't they now disappeared en masse too? No, because they
have square roots too (of complex numbers), indicated by the blue dots in the
above diagram.

So, in terms of the complex plane,
we now have completeness. But if we describe the complex plane as an x-axis and
a perpendicular x(imaginary)-axis (xi), what about the y and z equivalents (yi
and zi)?

3) So, we do exactly the same
thing for the y and z axes. Thus we get a six dimensional space x, xi, y, yi,
z, zi that we can designate as 6D(3r3i) where r stands for real numbers and i
for imaginary numbers. This is our complete mathematical space, stable under
any mathematical operation. Our previous mathematical designation of 4Di was
wrong for the simple reason that we had included only one imaginary axis rather
than matching up one to each of the x, y and z-axes. 4Di was short of two
imaginary dimensions, hence incomplete in the two directions where they were
absent. 4Di had the right shape because in the context of calculating the
distance between any two points, it allowed three zones to be generated: real
distances, imaginary distances and null distances. These three zones constitute
the essence of Einstein's special theory of relativity. But they are so much
more than that. They are the basis of God, the mind, the soul, the afterlife.
The "null zone" - outside space and time - is the province of religion.
The "imaginary zone" - inside space and time - is the province of
conventional science. The "real zone" - where the speed of light is
always exceeded - can be considered a kind of mirror image of the imaginary
zone.

Consider the following properties
of entities moving at subluminal speeds (below light speed) and those at
superluminal speeds (above light speed):

__Subluminal __

a) Can never be accelerated to
lightspeed.

b) Would need infinite energy to
attain light speed (and would gain infinite mass).

c) Travel forward through
time.

d) Time runs more slowly as
lightspeed is approached. Distances shrink.

e) Time runs forward faster and
faster as zero speed is approached.

f) Cannot escape a black hole.

g) As they lose energy, they
approach zero speed.

h) Go slower and slower until they
lose all kinetic energy.

i) As they lose energy, they
travel slower through space and faster (forwards) through time.

j) As they gain energy, they
travel faster through space and slower (forwards) through time.

k) In their own frame of
reference, they have real mass, experience real distances and real time. (In
contrast, photons that exist in the null zone have zero mass and experience
zero distances and zero time.)

__Superluminal__

__ __

a) Can never be slowed down to
lightspeed.

b) Would need infinite energy to
attain light speed (and would gain infinite mass).

c) Travel backward through time.

d) Time runs more slowly backwards
as lightspeed is approached. Distances shrink.

e) Time runs backward faster and
faster as infinite speed is approached.

f) Can escape a black hole.

g) As they lose energy, they
approach infinite speed.

h) Go faster and faster until they
lose all kinetic energy.

i) As they lose energy, they
travel faster through space and faster (backwards) through time.

j) As they gain energy, they
travel slower through space and slower (backwards) through time.

k) In their own frame of
reference, they have imaginary mass, experience imaginary distances and
imaginary time. (In contrast, photons that exist in the null zone have zero
mass, and experience zero distances and zero time.)

Neither subluminal nor
superluminal particles can cross the light speed barrier i.e. a superluminal
particle can never slow down to light speed, and can never cross into the
subluminal speed zone. By the same token, a subluminal particle can never speed
up to light speed and can never cross into the superluminal speed zone.

Thus we can imagine the speed of
light to be equivalent to the surface of a mirror, and the superluminal zone to
be the reflection of the subliminal zone, where everything is back to front -
particles lose energy as they speed up rather than gaining energy and time goes
backwards rather than forwards.

It is impossible for anything to
pass through the mirror to the reflection. And is a reflection real in any
case? Or is the superluminal zone simply describing what we would get if we ran
the movie of life backwards, erasing everything that ever took place?

http://armageddonconspiracy.co.uk/The-Imaginary-Dimension(2112219).htm

* * * * *

So, 6 is the "magic"
number that describes the minimum number of dimensions required to provide the
framework for complete mathematics.

Six is one of the most special of
numbers. It is the first "perfect" number (its three divisors 1, 2
and 3 add up to 6). Also, 1x2x3 = 6. Also, 6 is the number of the first three
levels of the tetraktys, and the fourth level may be considered the cosmos that
is constructed from those fundamental upper levels.

In an Order 6 magic square, each
column, row, and major diagonal adds up to 111. All six columns added together
equal a certain esoteric number of immense power, as do all six of the rows
added together, as do all the numbers between 1 and 36.

The number in question is none
other than 666.

__Order 6
Magic Square__

6 32 3
34 35 1

7 11 27 28 8 30

24 14 16 15 23 19

13 20 22 21 17 18

25 29 10 9
26 12

36 5 33 4 2 31

Apart from being one of the
numbers associated with Abraxas, 666 is the number of light, of the sun, and of
Lucifer. Now you know why Christians call it the Number of the Beast. Something
of an irony given that they are the ones who choose to worship the Devil -
Yahweh/Satan.

One of the earliest and most
potent symbols of the Illuminati was the one imprinted on the gold signet ring
of Solomon, his great ring of power, said to be imbued with the highest magic.
This symbol is the so-called "Seal of Solomon", based on the
hexagram, the six-pointed star. Note that the Seal features a circle around the
hexagram, the circle being the symbol of both "nothing" and its twin,
infinity. The Seal also contains a central hexagon (another symbol of 6) and
six satellite equilateral triangles (symbols of 3). And it contains 6
individual monads. Above all, it contains two large, interpenetrating
equilateral triangles that comprise the hexagram. The triangle pointing upwards
is the "masculine" one, while the one pointing downwards is the
matching feminine one. Male and female coming together creates the cosmos.

This is exactly like the 3D domain
of real numbers coming together with the 3D domain of imaginary numbers to form
the 6D cosmos. The Seal of Solomon is the perfect symbol of the 6D universe,
with the real and imaginary numbers fully interpenetrating each other.

The six lines of the hexagram, the
six apexes of the hexagram and the six dots (monads) make up 666. It was the
Seal of Solomon that the Christians found so abominable. It was identified with
Simon Magus, the true Christ whom the Christians regarded as the
Antichrist/Beast, and whom they believed would return to the world prior to the
"true" Second Coming. In those early Christian times, members of the
Illuminati often marked their right hand with the sign of the Seal.

The Book of Revelation: 13:16-18:

16 He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor,
free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads,

17 and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark
or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

18 Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the
number of the beast, for it is the number of a man: His number is 666.

(Note that in the Middle Ages the
great symbol of the Seal became associated with Judaism in what is now known as
the "Star of David". Before that, the menorah, the seven-branched
candelabrum, was the unambiguous, quintessential symbol of Judaism. The Jews
have now completely hijacked the hexagram symbol, meaning that it is rarely
used by the Illuminati in the present day. It is because of the links between
the Seal of Solomon and the Star of David that the Illuminati were accused of
being secret Jews by those clueless people who understood nothing of the
history of the respective symbols.

The 6D(3r3i) mathematical space is
based on two sets of complementary dimensions, three real and three imaginary,
inextricably intertwined with each other. "3" is of course another
supremely special number, the number of the trinity, the triad, the dialectic
(thesis, antithesis and synthesis). It is the first male number and represents
harmony since it equals 1 (the monad = unity, the number of Reason) plus 2 (the
dyad = diversity, otherness, the first female number) i.e. 3, the triad equals
harmony = unity + diversity. And 6 = the number of Creation since it equals the
first female number (2) plus the first male number (3) + 1 (the supreme monad).

So, if the three real dimensions
(designated by x, y and z) are at right angles to each other and create an
edgeless cube that extends infinitely in all directions to completely fill
"real space", where do the three imaginary dimensions (which we may
label as xi, yi and zi) fit in? There's no room!

But if we say that the y-axis is
at right angles to the x-axis and the xi-axis is also at right angles to the
x-axis in the same plane then we are effectively saying that there is a certain
relationship between the y-axis and the xi-axis. We can extend this thinking to
show that the z-axis is related to the yi-axis and the x-axis to the zi-axis:

The mapping of imaginary axes to
real axes:

xi <=> y; yi <=> z; zi
<=> x

In other words, we can imagine the
three imaginary dimensions being fitted exactly over the three real dimensions,
but at a different orientation according to the mapping we have just described.

It is an arrangement that is both breathtakingly simple and breathtakingly
complex. In some sense all real numbers of one dimension (e.g. the x-axis) are
also imaginary numbers of another dimension (e.g. the zi-axis). Thus all
numbers are dual entities, both real and imaginary, and it is this duality that
underpins the two "separate" dimensions that we call space and time.

Astonishing as it may seem, the
essence of Einstein's special theory or relativity is contained within the
simple diagram we showed earlier.

Consider the following pairs of
coordinates P1 and P2, where the second coordinate of P1 and P2 is an imaginary
number:

a) P1 (2, 3); P2 (5,5)

b) P1 (4,1); P2 (6,7)

c) P1 (1,1); P2 (6,6)

For a), the distance (d) between
P1 and P2 is, using Pythagoras's Theorem:

d2 = (5-2)2 + (5-3)i2 = 9 - 4 = 5,
so d = + √5 or - √5 (since a quadratic equation has two roots, one positive and
one negative).

For b) d2 = (6-4)2 + (7-1)i2 = 4 -
36 = -32, so d = + (√32)i or - (√32)i

For c) d2 = (6-1)2 + (6-1)i2 = 25
- 25 = 0, so d = + 0 or - 0 = 0

So, the distance between any two
points in our diagram will be either (+ real number) or (- real number) or (+
imaginary number) or (- imaginary number) or zero. Nothing else is possible.

If we flood this 2D(1r1i)
"world" with formless energy, some will flow into the domain of
positive real numbers, some into the domain of negative real numbers, some into
the domain of positive imaginary numbers, some into the domain of negative
imaginary numbers, and some into the zero zone. Nothing else is possible.

The zero zone is the domain of
massless particles such as photons. All distances in this zone are zero.

Any points that lie on lines that
strike the x-axis at an angle of 45 degrees (or 90 + 45 = 135 degrees, or 180 +
45 = 225 degrees, or 270 + 45 = 315 degrees) will exist in the zero zone. Even
if P1 is (0,0) and P2 (infinity, infinity), the distance between the two points
will still be zero. In other words, a particle could travel from P1 (0,0) to P2
(infinity, infinity) and yet not travel any distance! (hence it would take no
time). Such particles are exhibiting one of the central paradoxes of existence:
they move and yet don't get anywhere since they always cover zero distance.
They could traverse every point in the universe in no time without covering any
distance. Such is the supreme mystery of the zero zone.

Note that the whole diagram could
be covered with 45, 135, 225 and 315-degree lines, meaning that every point in
existence is connected to the zero zone. The whole cosmos has a link to the
zero zone. Here, everything is interconnected outside space and time.

Nothing can pass from the real
zone to the imaginary zone because the zero zone is an impenetrable barrier
between the two zones. You can only enter it if you have zero mass.

So, this simple diagram with one
real axis and one imaginary axis is a perfect model of the mathematics of
special relativity. If the 2D(1r1i1) world (corresponding to the x and
x-imaginary axes) is simply scaled up (to accommodate the equivalent y and z 2D
worlds), we obtain the full 6D(3r3i) cosmos. But the principles remain exactly
the same and everything that is true of the 2D space is true of the 6D space.

Hence our simple 2D world of one
real and one imaginary axis shows how a zone can be created within that world
in which everything is linked to everything else by zero distance. From this
unique perspective, the whole cosmos is in fact a zero-dimensional singularity
like that at the centre of a black hole or the Big Bang. And yet this
singularity exists within a vast cosmos where any two points can also be
separated by anything other than zero distance.

In one and the same cosmos, we
have everything separate and everything connected. Both statements are
simultaneously true. So much for Aristotelian logic. Now you see why only
dialectical logic suffices in these extreme conditions. Imagine holding a
needle sideways in front of you. You clearly see its whole length. Then rotate
the needle until you only see its point. The cosmos operates the same way. From
some angles you see it as a substantial object, yet there is an angle where it
becomes almost invisible - a singularity. Everything depends on the angle. From
the viewpoint of the needlepoint, it is connected to everything! This domain,
outside space and time, is where our afterlife is guaranteed. The part of us -
our mind/soul - that has the perspective of the needle tip cannot die. It is
immortal. It is linked to everything else. It is linked to God.

At this very instant you are
linked to everything that has ever been, and everyone who has ever lived, and
to God. You are in direct contact with any of your loved ones who have died.
The only reason you don't know it is that your consciousness is trapped in a
certain time-space perspective. When you achieve gnosis - enlightenment - your
perspective instantly switches to that of the needle point and you are at one
with the cosmos.

Can you begin to see the light?
It's all in the mathematics. Mathematics is reality. Mathematics guarantees
that part of us - our essence, not the mortal part of space and time - is
immortal. If you accept Einstein's special theory of relativity you have
virtually accepted the existence of an afterlife, of souls, of God. Isn't that
amazing? Atheistic scientists have wilfully ignored the astonishing
ramifications of one of their own key theories. They are DETERMINED not to see
God, such is their slavish devotion to materialism - which has become their
strange, hopeless religion.

http://armageddonconspiracy.co.uk/The-Imaginary-Dimension(2112219).htm

**The Profound Mystery of Time**

** **

** **

If time is grounded in imaginary
space and there are three dimensions of imaginary space then doesn't that mean
that time is three-dimensional rather than the single dimensional arrow of time
that we experience? We can never travel backwards or sideways or up and down in
time…we just go forward.

But is that true? Physicists say
that superluminal particles would be perceived by us to go backwards in time,
so, in theory at least, it's possible for time to have a reverse direction. But
Einstein's equations of special relativity actually indicate that superluminal
particles would experience "imaginary" time, but no scientist knows
what that is. There's actually a huge problem with defining what time is in
scientific equations, and what its negative might be. Is "negative"
time (t), simply -t compared with t? But what about imaginary time and negative
imaginary time: it and -it? Where do they fit in? And what if time is actually
complex and has a real part and an imaginary part? What then? Science doesn't
have a clue about any of this. Time is always handled as an ill-defined
"bodge"; it seems to work (more by accident than design), but there's
no firm theoretical foundation for it.

Why does it work at all? Time is
regarded as a one-dimensional scalar quantity. It has a magnitude and, in our
experience, it goes one way only - forward. But consider distance. A straight
line between two points is a one-dimensional scalar. But if we have drawn a
straight line in a 3D space then its two ends may have x, y and z coordinates
such as (3, 4, 7) and (10, 2, 8) i.e. it is now actually a vector (a
directional line) in 3D space and not just any old line. But, in real life, its
magnitude may be all that really matters to us. If we have to walk ten
kilometres from one place to another, it is the distance travelled that will
matter to us. We won't be aware of how the x, y and z coordinates constantly
change as we move; the vector elements are almost irrelevant. Obviously, we
need to be walking in the right direction to reach our desired destination, but
once that is established, it is the magnitude that preoccupies us. Time is
treated as a scalar but is actually a vector, exactly like distance. We just
don't notice its vector aspects.

In 6D(3r3i), it is possible to go
forwards/backwards, left/right, up/down. Exactly the same is true of imaginary
space, hence of time. In 6D(3r3i) space, positive and negative space, and
imaginary and negative imaginary space, can all be defined. By the same token,
positive and negative time, and imaginary and negative imaginary time can all
be defined. A proper scientific theory of everything needs to be able to
clearly distinguish between all of these different cases.

Many scientific equations involve
taking the square root, but a square root always has a positive and negative
solution for both real and imaginary numbers. Often, science only accepts one
solution as real: the positive root of a real number. Everything else is
discarded as unreal. Yet Einstein's special theory of relativity and the
quantum mechanical treatment of "antimatter" show how wrong this
approach is. The world is enormously more complex. It's no wonder that
scientists haven't got a clue what dark matter and dark energy are since, on
the whole, they have rejected all of the "unreal" solutions where
these mysterious entities are unquestionably lurking.

The cosmos is not ruled by real
and imaginary numbers (the extreme cases), but by the numbers in-between: the
complex numbers that have both a real and imaginary component. Science, again
by accident more than design, has found equations that actually deal
effectively with complex numbers, but scientists are unaware of why their
equations actually work. After all, they have no idea what the core
dimensionality of the cosmos is. According to relativitists, the cosmos is a 4D
spacetime continuum, while M Theory posits 11 dimensions. Is it any wonder quantum mechanics can't
be reconciled with the general theory of relativity (concerning gravity)? How
can the two theories be blended if they can't define something as basic as
dimensionality? We have no doubt at all that if relativists and M-theorists
both start using 6D(3r3i), many of the difficulties in merging the two theories
will vanish.

Another point worth mentioning is
what we mean by "going back in time". If I truly travel back in time
by, say, ten years then it means that I go back to who I was and where I was
ten years ago, and everything that happened to me in the interim is erased.
However, most people think that time travel means going back to the past but as
they are now. The two situations are entirely different.

In the former case, time has truly
been reversed. In the second case, it hasn't been reversed at all because the
time traveller's consciousness is still GOING FORWARD in time.

Going forward in time actually
means that INFORMATION always increases. To go back in time would mean to erase
INFORMATION and that can never happen. This is why we experience time as always
going forward even though it is actually three dimensional like space. It is
INFORMATION FLOW that has only one direction in time. Our consciousness, hence
our experience of time, is linked to this information flow, not to time itself.
We can't go back in time in terms of reversing time (erasing information). If
we could experience the time of ten years ago, but with our present knowledge,
then we would still be going forward in time in terms of information. Such is
the mystery of time.

Time needs to be completely
re-examined in philosophical, religious and scientific terms. The 6D(3r3i)
paradigm provides the only mathematically, scientifically and philosophically coherent
framework in which to define and analyze time.

As
Neitzche said, It's time for a revaluation of all values!

http://armageddonconspiracy.co.uk/The-Imaginary-Dimension(2112219).htm

* * * * *

**The Profound Mystery of Schrödinger's Quantum Mechanical Wave Equation**

Schrödinger's wave equation is one
of the most important in physics. If you look it up, you will discover that it
has the imaginary number right at its heart. What's that there for? How does it
make any sense in the "real" world (of real numbers)?

No physicist actually knows why
it's there. They simply know that it works. But we know the reason - it's
precisely because of 6D(3r3i) space. The imaginary dimensions are every bit as
"real" and important as the real dimensions. Quantum mechanical
particles need to be treated as 6D complex numbers (with real and imaginary
parts). Schrödinger's equation achieves this by incorporating the imaginary
number along with real components, but Schrödinger, and every other scientist,
has never been able to account for why the imaginary number is essential to
quantum particles. We have now given the reason - 6D(3r3i) complete mathematics
requires it.

All quantum "weirdness"
stems from the fact that these tiny, almost massless, particles are whizzing
around in 6D(3r3i) space rather than 3D real space, and are fluttering in and
out of the null zone that exists outside space and time (hence these particles
can seem to be in two or more places at once). This is the "physical"
model of what is actually taking place at the quantum level, a subject that has
hitherto baffled all scientists, who have never been able to form any kind of
picture of what is taking place. Once again, 6D(3r3i) provides the decisive
breakthrough.

The famous Einstein Podolsky Rosen
paradox concerning instantaneous communication between correlated particles
separated by enormous distances is explained with consummate ease: the
particles are linked outside space and time via the null zone which links all
points in the cosmos. Simple stuff! Yet it has defied the greatest scientific
minds for decades.

M-theory will never work because
scientists are groping their way forward without actually knowing what they're
doing and without having any logical conceptual framework in which to work.
They are continually changing their ideas to suit the latest experimental data,
rather than logically working out what NEEDS to be true.

Over and over again, scientists
manage to find good equations, but they never really know why they work, just
that they do. That's why there are so many rival interpretations of what
quantum mechanics actually means in terms of reality. That debate should end
thanks to the 6D(3r3i) space of complete mathematics.

The complete mathematical space
6D(3r3i) provides the framework for the Grand Unified Theory of Everything.
Everything that can happen, happens within this space. One way of thinking
about the cosmos is to consider a single point and its relationship with the
infinite number of other points in the cosmos. The point we choose will be
separated by a certain distance from each of these infinite other points. There
are only three possible types of distance it can experience: a "real"
separation, an "imaginary" separation" or a null (zero) separation.
That's it. Nothing else can happen. The same is true for every point in the
cosmos. If we want the simplest possible way of thinking about the cosmos it is
this: energy moves from point to point and as it does so it crosses a real
distance, an imaginary distance or no distance at all. This staggeringly simple
model describes everything that can ever happen in the cosmos from a scientific
standpoint. All the complexity we see around us is simply the manifestation of
what happens when energy, spread across an infinity of points, moves around
from one point to another within that infinite matrix - the ultimate cosmic
game of Musical Chairs except no chairs are ever removed and the music never
stops.

The null zone - where distinct
points are separated by no distance - is the key to the whole edifice. Here,
and here alone, time and space do not exist. Dimensionality disappears.
Movement occurs, and yet no distance is ever traversed. Everything here is
interconnected, interpenetrating, flowing over and into each other endlessly.
This is the extraordinary domain of the mind, the soul, the afterlife, God. It
is the dazzling domain of light.

It is this null zone that
underlies the Buddhist conception of nirvana - the underlying Oneness where
everything is interconnected and where the individual is
"extinguished". He enters into union with Zero, with nullity, so to
speak. And also with infinity since the null zone is as strongly associated
with infinity as its twin zero. So, Buddhists must be congratulated. Nirvana is
certainly an enlightened concept that expresses much of the essence of the null
zone. Equally, the Hindu concept of Brahman, the universal soul, the eternal,
infinite, immanent, transcendent reality and ground of all being can be equated
with the null zone, so Hindus too must be congratulated. Nirvana and Brahman
both lie beyond the "veil of illusion", which we can equate with the
r > 0 physical cosmos, the cosmos where distances between points are real or
imaginary, but not zero. As for Taoism, the Tao is the ultimate creative
principle of the universe in which all things are unified and connected: again,
this is strikingly like the null zone.

Buddhism and Hinduism, if they
dropped their allegiance to the idiotic concept of karma, would be truly
enlightened, and close to the fundamental truth of existence. Taoism is
arguably one step closer already to Illumination since it avoids karmic
thinking. The Abrahamists with their idea of a creator God external to the
universe rather than at the centre of it are the forces of darkness, utterly
estranged from the light.

It's time for an end to all the
mumbo jumbo, hocus pocus and mysticism. We have provided, as we promised we
would, the framework in which all the issues of religion, philosophy, science
and mathematics can be treated in a comprehensive, unified, integrated manner.
Science and religion do not describe two separate universes, and "never
the twain shall meet" is a false notion. There is only one universe.
Science and religion come at the same problem from two different angles, but
they are dealing with exactly the same problem, not a completely separate one.
If religion does not or cannot specify the mathematical and scientific
framework in which it is said to manifest itself then it's not worth a cent.
It's literally nothing but madness and delusion, into which human fantasy will
flow unopposed, completely disconnected from reality and truth.

**Only the framework we have provided allows a proper consideration of
religion. Only this framework links it indissolubly with science, philosophy
and mathematics. Religion has nothing whatsoever to do with faith. Religion is
a special type of science that operates fully within the scientific framework.
We have shown that religion is the province of the null zone where time and
space do not apply - where everything endures forever i.e. the part of us that
exists in the null zone cannot die; we have a guaranteed afterlife.**

Descartes described the mind as
being without "extension". In the null zone, we have exactly that
extensionless domain of mind. Panpsychism asserts that mind is everywhere. We
have seen that every point in existence is indeed connected to the null zone,
so mind is omni-present. Enlightened religions talk of everything being
interconnected. We have demonstrated that this is true within the null zone.
Enlightened religions say that we can enter into union with God. Again, the
null zone provides this precise possibility. All psychic and paranormal
phenomena are mediated through this "magic" zone of cosmic interconnectivity.
We haven't even begun to tap into the extraordinary powers that reside within
this zone, that can convert us into gods.

Have we not provided the entry
point to all the mysteries of the cosmos? Have we not provided the Solomon Key?

The information presented here
speaks for itself. Illumination is the only truly valid religion. It is the
only religion based on science, mathematics, philosophy, logic, and reason. It
is a religion of knowledge, not faith. The Eastern religions are pale
imitations. The Abrahamic religions are preposterous. Atheism is the
quasi-religious worship of scientific materialism. Agnosticism is for people
who are paralyzed by doubt, indecision and lack of knowledge.

To access the truth, you don't
have to take any "leap of faith". You simply have to think.

The adherents of Illumination are
incredibly loyal. Why? Because they have at last found what they were always
looking for - the one, true religion that avoided all the ridiculous bullshit
of all the rest. It is not a "finished" religion. It's a dialectical
religion, always making itself more perfect, always embracing new knowledge and
new insights. It is never out of date. It is not frozen in time like Abrahamism
which gets less and less relevant with every passing day. All the followers of
Illumination can contribute to its development. There are no prophets and no
holy texts. Ideas are adopted according to their merit. Illuminism is all about
meritocracy. The smartest, most meritorious make the biggest contributions.

Illuminism has no connection whatsoever with faith. We don't
expect anyone to "believe" a single word of what we have said. Our
religion has no time for those who cling to Holy Scripture and the words of
dead prophets. All faith-based religious statements are intrinsically absurd
and quintessentially UNBELIEVABLE. That's the supreme irony of the Abrahamic
religions. They are all about belief, yet no one with a brain and power of
rational thought could ever believe them.

We have presented Illuminism as a
set of philosophical, religious, mathematical and scientific statements. Slowly
but surely we have constructed the edifice that everyone can now see for
themselves. We have quoted no holy books of Illuminism that you must accept
without question; we have quoted no prophets of Illuminism whom you must
believe utterly or suffer eternal hellfire.

Every statement we have made is
capable of being analyzed and challenged. If you think you can improve
Illuminism, go for it! Illuminism is a dialectical religion; it is perfecting
itself, just as the cosmos itself is. That is the fundamental nature of the
dialectic.

The following are the essential
points of Illuminism, the logical premises by which it stands or falls:

*Q. What is the arche, the
fundamental substance of existence?
*

A. It is "minded",
formless, striving, dimensionless energy - Pure Will. Since it is
dimensionless, it does not experience the "mortal" dimensions of
space and time, hence is immortal. It has always existed and it will always
exist. It is existence itself. It can never not exist. It accords with the
First law of Thermodynamics that energy can neither be created nor destroyed.
It cannot be brought into existence and nor can it be removed from existence;
it has simply always existed. But, crucially, it can be transformed. Its
quality can be improved until it's perfect.

*Q. How does the formless arche
attain form? *

A. Through the only thing that can
provide absolute order, organization, system, stability, pattern, logic -
Mathematics, the queen of the sciences, the sacred science. Nothing else exists
that can accomplish what mathematics can. It is the ONLY candidate for
providing cosmic form, law and organized behaviour.

*Q. In that case, where does
mathematics come from? How is the cosmos able to understand mathematics? *

A. Mathematics is in fact the
surest proof of cosmic mind and intelligence. It is absurd to propose, as
materialistic science does, that mindless matter is miraculously able to
organize itself in a host of complex ways according to the "laws of
physics". No scientist has ever explained where the laws of physics come
from and how they are possible. Why those laws and not others? Why any laws at
all? Why not eternal randomness and chaos? Why should matter be subject to law
at all? Why should matter have any connection with mathematics? In fact, the
cosmos "learned" mathematics over many eons by nothing more
sophisticated than trial and error, evolutionary natural selection and
dialectical progression: the principles that have guided all existence since
time immemorial.

The cosmos in itself -
dimensionless energy - continually "spilled" out of itself into
dimensionality. It is the nature of Will never to be "contained". It
will always try to reach beyond itself. This was a haphazard process since
dimensionality is mathematical and mathematics did not yet exist in any
coherent way. Each time Will entered the domain of partial, incomplete
dimensionality, it learned some new item of mathematical information. After
countless "experiments", the Will had learned to count and understand
geometrical shapes. Not in any conscious sense - more like the ultimate
autistic savant. Its grasp of mathematics was strictly intuitive. Mathematics
was the first language ever learned by the cosmos; it is the fundamental
language of existence. It is the basis of all order and thought, of logic and
reason. Of mind. Of consciousness. It is the essential framework providing the
categories of understanding. It is the sine qua non.

Mathematics can be considered as the true Platonic Forms:
eternal, perfect, unchanging, existing in a permanent ideal state to which the
whole cosmos has access. They were not given to the cosmos as perfect Forms;
rather they dialectically evolved and when they reached their Omega Point they
were subject to no further change; they had achieved perfection and completion.
Plato's domain of perfect Forms is the domain of mathematics and it is now
hard-wired into the cosmos (we might say that this domain is stored in the core
memory of the cosmic mind, the Read-Only memory, to use a computing term.) The
Will learned through its endless experimentation that only "complete"
mathematics is stable and provides a proper framework for organization and
order: all of Plato's mathematical Forms must be used, not an incomplete
subset. And so came the miraculous moment when the r = 0 dimensionless cosmos
of mind deliberately poured itself out into the r > 0 dimensional cosmos,
according to a perfect intuitive understanding of complete mathematics as
eternal Platonic Forms. Formlessness flowed through the domain of mathematical
Forms and emerged in the myriad forms we observe in Nature. Plato's
mathematical Forms are the origins of the laws of physics that shape the world
we observe around us. They dictated the creation of the material world. This
supreme, defining event was none other than the Big Bang itself.

*Q. What would you say is the
purpose of existence?*

A. It is essential for the cosmos
to externalize itself, to physicalize itself, to alienate itself, in order to
dialectically overcome that alienation and reach self-consciousness. The
teleological purpose of the cosmos is precisely that: to attain
self-consciousness, to actualize all of the latent powers, potential and
possibilities of raw mind. No scientist has ever explained how mind originates
in dead, mindless matter. The truth is that the arche is alive and minded and
always has been. There is no dualism between life and death, between mind and
non-mind, between consciousness and non-consciousness. Everything exists on a
continuum of actualization of life, mind and consciousness. Humans have more of
it (more actualization) than plants, which have more of it than rocks which
have more of it than interstellar dust. The cosmos is based on monism, not
dualism. To be precise, it is a dialectical monism. All dualistic systems -
those based on two radically different concepts such as mind/matter,
death/life, consciousness/non-consciousness - all fail for exactly the same
reason: two unlike substances cannot interact.

Existence is a cosmic equation
permanently solving itself. It can give a final answer to itself - it can
create meaning - only when it becomes conscious of itself. Human beings -
smart, rational ones, at least - are dimly conscious of mathematical reality,
but full consciousness becomes possible only when a mind attains gnosis and
achieves "God consciousness." God - perfection - is the meaning of the eternal
mathematical equation. It is God who decides to restart the equation and begin
the search for perfection all over again in the process known as "divine
suicide".

Existence consists of infinite
cycles of moving from total potential to total actualization with endless
possible ways of getting there. That's all it can ever do. It is a perfection
generator, yet perfection is fleeting. It soon becomes boring and hence
imperfect, so must destroy itself.

*Q. So if there is an infinite
number zeros/souls/monads, how can they come together to create one God who
then has the ability to commit the "divine suicide?"*

The maximum possible actualization
of reality would be for every monad to progress from total potential to total
actualization i.e. for every monad to become God. Now think of a black hole. If
a dying star is sufficiently big, it reaches a point of IRREVERSIBLE collapse
and the whole star vanishes into a singularity. For a nuclear bomb to work, you
must create a critical mass of nuclear material in order to generate the
explosive chain reaction. Another useful concept is that of a phase change. At
0 degrees Celsius, liquid water changes phase to ice and at 100 degrees it
changes phase to vapor. The same sorts of ideas apply to the God universe. Once
you reach a critical - FINITE - number of God-monads, you trigger an
unstoppable chain reaction across the universe. The universe undergoes an
irreversible transformation and changes phase to pure mind, pure divinity (to
the God of Gods - meaning that the whole universe of Gods operates as one God).
So, an omega point will definitely occur in an infinite system, though only a
finite trigger is required. (The reason is that the creation of Gods already
bridges the gap between the finite and infinite since humans are finite and
Gods are infinite.)

http://armageddonconspiracy.co.uk/The-Imaginary-Dimension(2112219).htm

* * * * *

Mathematical dialectical monism
based on complete mathematics provides the answer to Leibniz's requirement that
the best account of the world is the one that is "simplest in hypotheses
and the richest in phenomena." Complete mathematics achieves precisely
this. Nothing else could accomplish this with the same simplicity, consistency,
efficiency and elegance. In fact nothing else is even conceivable.

Complete mathematics also
addresses Leibniz's fundamental question of why there is something rather than
nothing. "Nothing" - zero - is something. It is a mathematical
number, one of the complete set; in fact at the very origin of the complete
set. Complete mathematics asserts that all numbers have equal "reality",
hence zero is as real, has as much existence, as any other number. Zero can be
defined as 1/∞. So, already, we can see that it is something and not nothing.
In fact, any finite number divided by infinity equals zero. Zero is the twin of
infinity - the other side of the coin, the flip side, the inverse - and
contains all numbers.

The question why is there
something rather than nothing is really an implicit acknowledgement of the
stance of scientific materialism that dimensionless existence is impossible. To
an idealist who rejects materialism, the question would be reformulated as: is
it possible for mind/thinking not to exist? Could there ever have been a time
when there was no thought? If so, what caused the first thought and indeed what
was the first thought? And if something caused the first thought then the
precursor of thought must always have existed. But if thought or its precursor
has always existed then "something" has always existed.

Pure nothingness is quite simply
impossible. And when we understand the indissoluble relationship between
nothing and infinity, we see why. Everything is implicit in nothing. Infinity
can pour forth from nothing. "Nothing" is defined with regard to the
finite divided by the infinite i.e. it is finite "something" divided
by infinite "something". It is not defined with regard to nothing. No
definition of nothing can ever be formulated. It is an impossible state. It
cannot exist. Pure nothingness is outside the scope of complete mathematics,
hence cannot have "reality". Scientists who talk of a "free
lunch" universe assert that the overall energy of the universe is zero
because the positive mass-energy of the cosmos is exactly balanced by the
negative gravitational energy i.e. something came from nothing but only because
something is always implicit in nothing, and because somethings can have
opposite signs and cancel each other out, leaving zero on the one hand and an
infinity of balanced energy on the other.

The cosmos at the
"scientific" level may be considered as energy moving through a
complete mathematical space where the distance between any two points can be
zero, real or imaginary (positive or negative). The zero zone, the
"null" zone, is outside space and time. The imaginary zone is what
relativity describes as "timelike", and the real zone as
"spacelike". We exist in the timelike zone where no speed ever
exceeds light speed. In the spacelike zone, no speed can ever fall below light
speed. But note the fundamental asymmetry: subluminal speeds go from zero to
the finite speed of light (as measured in space-time reference frames), while
superluminal speeds go from the finite speed of light all the way to infinity.
All symmetry-breaking phenomena deserve the most careful study because it is
they that make the cosmos what it is and not just some eternal cancelling out
of symmetrical properties where nothing significant would ever evolve.
Asymmetry is essential to evolution and teleology.

We have
given you Solomon's key to the secrets of the cosmos. Use it wisely. Use it
well. Use it to become all that you have it in you to be. Maximize your
potential. Be great. Be divine.

04.26.2014