In his book Parallel Worlds, physicist Michio Kaku says:


"…the visible matter we see around us (including the mountains, planets, stars and galaxies) makes up a paltry 4 percent of the total matter and energy content of the universe. (Of that 4 percent, most of it is in the form of hydrogen and helium, and probably only 0.03 percent takes the form of the heavy elements). Most of the universe is actually made of mysterious, invisible material of totally unknown origin. The familiar elements that make up our world constitute only 0.03 percent of the universe. In some sense, science is being thrown back centuries into the past, before the rise of the atomic hypothesis, as physicists grapple with the fact that the universe is dominated by new, unknown forms of matter and energy…23 percent of the universe is made of a strange, undetermined substance called dark matter, which has weight, surrounds the galaxies in a gigantic halo, but is totally invisible…. it bends starlight, just like glass, and hence can be located by the amount of optical distortion it creates.


No one at the present time has any understanding of where this 'energy of nothing' comes from. 'Frankly, we just don't understand it. We know what its effects are [but] we're completely clueless…everybody's clueless about it,' admits Craig Hogan, an astronomer at the University of Washington at Seattle.


If we take the latest theory of subatomic particles and try to compute the value of this dark energy, we find a number that is off by 10120 (that's the number 1 followed by 120 zeros). This discrepancy between theory and experiment is far and away the largest gap ever found in the history of science. It is one of our greatest embarrassments - our best theory cannot calculate the value of the largest source of energy in the entire universe. Surely, there is a shelf full of Nobel Prizes for the enterprising individuals who can unravel the mystery of dark matter and dark energy."






There you have it, direct from the mouth of a leading physicist: science is completely baffled by the composition of 96 percent of the universe!


What we "know" has shrunk to a miserable 4 percent. Not so long ago, scientists thought that the so-called "standard model" of particle physics was in the process of explaining all of the contents of the cosmos. Now it explains close to nothing.


If you got 4 percent in a physics exam, it would be deemed a hopeless failure, showing that you knew next to nothing about the subject. Yet we still hear the old drumbeat that physicists are on the verge of producing a Grand Unified Theory of Everything. Dream on! Scientists haven't even completed task one yet - defining the appropriate framework for the problem.





In a previous article, we asked how many dimensions the cosmos has; how many it needs to be complete. No scientist has ever asked this basic question. For centuries, they all simply assumed that there were three of space and one of time, and that these were absolute i.e. had independent existence even if there were no objects in the universe. This is the entire basis of the enormously successful Newtonian physics that dominated Western scientific thinking until the advent of electromagnetism, relativity and quantum mechanics.


The only person who dared to challenge the Newtonian orthodoxy was the brilliant Illuminatus Leibniz, who described space and time in relational terms. Without any objects in the universe, Leibniz argued, space and time would not exist i.e. they are not mysterious substances but simply ways of describing relations between objects. If someone says that he is sitting in the same seat that he was occupying ten minutes ago he is describing his current space and time coordinates in relation to his previous space and time coordinates. No one ever provides absolute space and time coordinates. How would you even begin? Does the universe have a perfect cosmic clock that has been ticking since the beginning of time that someone can consult? Is there a perfect cosmic map with a dead centre that someone can use to identify their absolute spatial location?


With Einstein came the realisation that space and time were fused together in 4-dimensional spacetime. Even now, virtually no one comprehends the sheer scale of the revolution ushered in by Einstein. Some scientists still assert that Einsteinian physics is merely a development of Newtonian physics. Only people with no grasp of philosophy could make such a stupid statement. Einstein's theories represent an irrevocable break with the conceptual underpinning of Newtonian physics. As Einstein himself recognized, his ideas fall firmly into the relational Leibnizian camp.


Yet still we talk of 4 dimensions. Why 4? Why not any other number? Why not the 11 of M-theory? What is the theoretical basis of any calculation of the number of dimensions the universe must have? No scientist has ever had a clue.


So, we received from some brave souls the following answers to our question: 0, 1, 5, 8, 10 and infinity. There were various reasons given for these guesses, but there was a common theme that led people to guess the numbers they did. They were seeking a number that was "right" in terms of some principle of beauty, elegance, mystical suitability, or some inherent quality of the number itself that raised it above other numbers.


Pythagoras himself started off using exactly this type of thinking. Consider the following remarks by mathematician Marcus du Sautoy in his book The Music of the Primes:


"The origins of mathematicians' interest in this infinite sum came from music and went back to a discovery made by the Greeks. Pythagoras was the first to discover the fundamental connection between mathematics and music. He filled an urn with water and banged it with a hammer to produce a note. If he removed half the water and banged the urn again, the note had gone up an octave. Each time he removed more water to leave the urn one-third full, then one-quarter full, the notes produced would sound to his ear in harmony with the first note he'd played. Any other notes which were created by removing some other amount of water sounded in dissonance with that original note. There was some audible beauty associated with these fractions. The harmony that Pythagoras had discovered in the numbers 1, ½, 1/3, ¼…made him believe that the whole universe was controlled by music, which is why he coined the expression 'the music of the spheres.'


"…Ever since Pythagoras' discovery of an arithmetic connection between mathematics and music, people have compared both the aesthetic and the physical traits shared by the two disciplines…As Pythagoras discovered, it is not just in the aesthetic realm that mathematics and music overlap. The very physics of music has at its root the basis of mathematics. If you blow across the top of a bottle you hear a note. By blowing a little harder, and with a little skill, you can start to hear higher notes - the extra harmonics, the overtones. When a musician plays a note on an instrument they are producing an infinity of additional harmonics, just as you do when you blow across the top of the bottle. These additional harmonics help to give each instrument its own distinctive sound. The physical characteristics of each instrument mean that we hear different combinations of harmonics. In addition to the fundamental note, the clarinet plays only those harmonies produced by odd fractions: 1/3, 1/5, 1/7,…The string of a violin, on the other hand, vibrates to create all the harmonics that Pythagoras produced with his urn - those corresponding to the fractions ½, 1/3, ¼,…


"Since the sound of a vibrating violin string is the infinite sum of the fundamental note and all the possible harmonics, mathematicians became intrigued by the mathematical analogue. The infinite sum 1 + ½ + 1/3 + ¼… became known as the harmonic series." 


As Du Sautoy indicates, Pythagoras was in thrall to the relationship between music and mathematics. It made perfect aesthetic sense to Pythagoras that the universe should be of the nature of some majestic symphony by the Supreme Composer. How elegant, how beautiful, how right. Indeed how could it possibly be otherwise? Music represented order and harmony, the organization of chaos into something glorious and inspiring, something inherently beautiful that could fill humanity's souls with the most divine of feelings, that could raise their gaze to higher things.


"Mathematics and music are God's languages. When you speak them...you're speaking directly to God."

Rebecca Goldstein



So, the Illuminati became the first true students of music, and they sought to understand the Divine Mind as that of a cosmic musician who composed the finest melodies and harmonies, who provided perfect songs for soloists, choirs, orchestras, and the Dionysian Chorus that gave musical form to the great tales of Greek tragedy.


Pythagoras taught that the cosmos obeyed a mathematical law called Harmony, which ensured right relations between everything. The essence of harmony is that harmonious numbers can be written as ratios: 1/2, 3/2, 4/3 etc. Such numbers are literally rational. What could be more natural than that the cosmos was rational and harmonious, full of right proportion?


And then Pythagoras made a shattering discovery. Using his own famous theorem that in a right-angled triangle the square on the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares on the other two sides, he calculated what the hypotenuse would be for a right-angled triangle with sides one unit long and got the answer √2. No matter how hard he tried, he could not express the hypotenuse in this case as being in harmonious ratio with its sides. In a "3,4,5" triangle, the ratio of the respective sides to the hypotenuse could be written as 3/5 and 4/5. But what about 1/√2? Ugly, unacceptable! √2 wasn't any kind of harmonious number. Instantly, the whole edifice of Harmony collapsed. There were patterns in the world that weren't rational i.e. capable of being expressed in terms of ratios. They were irrational.


It was to resolve this crisis that Pythagoras devised one of the most profound and powerful ideas of all time: the Completeness Theorem.

This said that Harmony was but a subset of Completeness, hence not the full truth of the cosmos. Only mathematical completeness could reflect the essence of the cosmos. After all, how could incompleteness ever suffice? By definition, it would always be incomplete. The cosmos must be complete in a mathematical sense. If it were incomplete, the cosmos would be unstable. Inexplicable oddities, arising from the incompleteness, would abound. It would be impossible to analyze these. The cosmos would be a bizarre mixture of things that made complete sense and other things that were completely baffling. Nothing would be predictable because incompleteness might rear its end at any instant.


Pythagoras's Completeness Theorem was dialectically refined over the years. It is now expressed in the following terms:


1) The cosmos prefers no number over another. It does not exclude any number or discriminate against any number. To say that any number is "forbidden" by nature is absurd. Any theory based on anything less than the full set of numbers is by definition incomplete. Any such theory cannot properly describe the cosmos. Science, because it excludes zero and infinity, is formally incomplete and can only be complete once it embraces these two numbers.


2) All numbers are in fact infinite. The number 1 may seem to be finite, but it can be written as 1.0 followed by an infinite numbers of zeroes. All irrational numbers are infinite and all rational numbers can be written in infinite form (just as we illustrated with 1). Therefore the entire cosmos can be mapped with infinite exactitude. There are no gaps anywhere in the cosmos described by the full set of numbers, and every number is infinitely precise. Nothing can exist outside the full set of numbers. There is no room for anything else. Only the full set of numbers allows a full description of existence.


Imagine if there were a full set of numbers between 1.0 and 1.4 and between 1.5 and 2.0. What about the gap between 1.4 and 1.5? Imagine there were no numbers there - just an empty space. This would mean that anything that was smoothly flowing between 1.0 to 1.4 would come to a complete stop at 1.4. How would it bridge the mysterious gap to 1.5? In this little gap, the rules of the cosmos would be completely different. Physics would operate differently. Nature would operate differently. Calculus, the most important technique in physics and mathematics, would fail. Calculus is based on reducing the distance between two points to zero, and this is only possible because there's an infinitely small gap between any two adjacent points designated by infinitely precise numbers.


 If there were gaps between any numbers or they weren't all infinitely precise, calculus wouldn't work. Mathematical functions would break down. It wouldn't be valid to draw a line between two points if there was a mathematical lacuna between them. The cosmos would be unstable and would unravel.


3) The cosmos must be stable, hence numbers must provide a rock-solid platform. This means that no matter what mathematical operation is performed on them, they must resist instability. The full set of numbers must be stable under any global mathematical operation performed upon them, whether it be rotation, inversion, addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, raising them to a power, taking the mirror image etc. If any mathematical operation performed on an apparently full set of numbers resulted in something catastrophic then it would be proof that the proposed full set of numbers was in fact incomplete.


4) Nothing can exist outside "complete" mathematics. All possibilities are accommodated. There is nothing else. Complete mathematics specifies everything. Any theory that does not use complete mathematics is incomplete and cannot offer a full description of everything. Only complete mathematics provides the framework for a Grand Unified Theory of Everything. Once completeness has been established, nothing can exist outside it. Everything that is knowable is contained within the system. Everything that exists is contained within the system. 


5) To establish a Grand Unified Theory of Everything, the first task that must be accomplished is to describe the complete mathematics upon which it will be based. This is a task for mathematical logic, not for scientific experiments. No physicist, or indeed modern mathematician, has ever addressed the issue of complete mathematics.


6) The single most important aspect of complete mathematics is the question of dimensionality. How many dimensions are required to accommodate all conceivable numbers, to a depth of infinity, so that not a single point anywhere cannot be mapped to a unique number of infinite precision? Only once the issue of dimensionality has been definitively resolved can any Grand Unified Theory of Everything be constructed. M-theory, science's latest attempt at a Grand Unified Theory is based on 11 dimensions, but there is absolutely no theoretical basis for this number, hence M-theory, which remains a "work in progress" is certain to collapse in due course.


Humanity has always wanted to know everything, to peer into every dark corner of the cosmos, to resolve every riddle, paradox and mystery. Pythagoras's Completeness Theorem, based on defining mathematical completeness, is the foundation of Absolute Knowledge. The Completeness Theorem asserts that it is impossible for anything to exist outwith the framework of complete mathematics. Everything that can happen will happen in terms of complete mathematics, and nothing else. Anything that is not forbidden by complete mathematics is compulsory. There are no mysterious forces outside complete mathematics. Nothing can exist outwith complete mathematics. God himself can't escape complete mathematics, despite what the Abrahamists say. When Pythagoras declared, "All is number", this was his reference to his Completeness Theorem.


Mathematics specifies all that can exist, every form that the arche can take. There is quite simply nothing else. And, because human beings understand numbers, they can therefore understand the cosmos. As above, so below. Every corner of the cosmos obeys exactly the same mathematical laws. Any mind that grasps complete mathematics grasps everything. At that point, when you truly understand complete mathematics and all of its implications, you are capable of achieving gnosis and entering into union with the Divine Mind. But gnosis isn't just the "scientific" grasp of complete mathematics, it's also to feel it, to BE IT.


Imagine providing a perfect mathematical description of Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata in terms of a combination of basic sine waves. You have accomplished the scientific task. You have broken down all of the apparent complexity into something simple. You have understood how these sounds are assembled. You have measured their shape, frequency, wavelength, amplitude, pattern. You have understood so much. Yet at no point have you felt it. It is when you have tears in your eyes as you listen to the music that you have achieved gnosis regarding that piece of music. You are no longer looking at the music from outside. You are inside it. You are it. It reflects your will. It is your soul singing. Gnosis is about knowing the cosmos from inside and outside. 


We can give you the "outside" perspective. But you must provide the inside perspective for yourself. Only you can. No one can do it on your behalf. You must internalise it. You must feel it. You must become one with the cosmos, feeling every part of it, sensing every part of it, comprehending every part. And then you are Abraxas. You have become God. Literally.


Plato asserted that what appears as "learning" is in fact "remembering". The soul, before it became incarnate in the body, existed in the realm of Ideas where it was surrounded by the perfect "Forms" i.e. by the contents of Absolute Knowledge in Plato's view. In this domain, the soul perceived everything as it truly is rather than as the pale copy or shadow of truth that we encounter in the mortal world of imperfection. The right questions can draw out this latent, forgotten knowledge of Absolute Truth. We are already imbued with everything we need to know but our mortality has obscured it, has transformed the perfect originals into inaccurate copies and simulacra that present only a distorted version of reality.


Human beings are already the embodiment of complete mathematics. We are written in mathematics. We don't need to be expert mathematicians in any conscious sense in order to have an intuitive grasp of mathematics. For most of us, our consciousness gets in the way of our grasp of mathematics. Like Plato's souls, we become confused in the world of space and time. Yet every time we catch a ball, we are carrying out an extremely complex mathematical operation that most of us wouldn't have the vaguest idea how to describe in mathematical equations. We just "do it" - we don't think about it. It is internalised, intuitive, and we have a supreme grasp of it. Autistic savants can perform mathematical wonders faster than computers without having the vaguest idea of what they are doing. The answer just leaps out at them. How? From where? They are like Platonic souls hardwired into the perfect Mathematical Forms. They "see" mathematics without understanding it consciously. They don't need to.


Most people love music and it is when they are listening to their favourite songs that they come closest to appreciating mathematics. Music is audible mathematics. Schopenhauer described music as a copy of the cosmic will. It moves us so much because it is actually tuning us into the pulse of the dialectic itself, of the teleological desire to grow, to strive, to develop, to go forward, to revel in the life force. (Schopenhauer is absolutely right: music is mathematical, just as the cosmic will is.)


So, don't imagine that you have to be a mathematical genius to "get it". Everyone gets it one way or another. It's built in. We can access it intuitively. We are all autistic savants in this regard, if we did but know it. We just need to dig deeper to reveal that side of our inner selves.


Listen to music. Relax. Have some wine (or another drug of your choice). Think of numbers, shapes, patterns, geometrical figures. Imagine yourself walking through a Platonic domain of perfect squares, triangles, circles, hyperbolas, parabolas, cubes, spheres, cylinders, enormous numbers, some clear as glass, some in the colours of the rainbow, some glowing, some translucent, some flashing. Imagine yourself in a rowing boat on a fast-flowing river of numbers. In a strong wind of numbers. Standing atop a mountain of numbers.


You are immersed in an ocean of numbers. Numbers are imprinted on everything. Existence as we know it consists of formlessness and form fused together. Minded energy provides the formless part, and mathematics the form. The interaction between the arche and mathematics is so close, so intimate, that it becomes impossible to say where one ends and the other begins. So, mathematics can be validly identified with the arche, in accordance with Pythagoras's inspired insight. The arche might be called mathematical energy, the mathematical part taking the role of elementary mind, from which human minds, with human consciousness, ultimately emerged.


The universe is made of formless energy sculpted into form by mathematics. Mathematics is Pygmalion sculpting his perfect woman - Galatea - and then bringing her to life by imbuing her with mind and consciousness. Life, mind and consciousness are mathematical in origin. Eternal life is made possible by mathematics. Souls are mathematical entities. God is the apex of mathematical possibility. God is the Monad, the Whole, the One: the cosmos alive, conscious, and free to do absolutely anything it wishes.


Mathematics at some level is alive, and it is trying to solve its own cosmic equation. The force that keeps it going is the dialectic. Mathematics is like an enormous computer that will never stop calculating until it has provided the answer to "life, the universe, and everything." The amusing answer, provided by Douglas Adams in the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, is "42". The real answer is Abraxas. God is the final mathematical solution of the cosmos.


Adams made the fascinating suggestion that the ultimate question of life was being constructed via a planetary computer/mind: Earth. In fact, both the question and the answer are provided not by a planet but by the cosmos itself. The ultimate question is: "What is the maximum potential of existence?" The answer is God. The cosmos evolves from maximum potential to maximum expression of that potential.


Every human being grows from a fertilized egg to a baby to a youth to an adult - from potential to actualization. The supreme human lives are those in which the adults squeeze out every last drop of their potential in concrete and glorious achievements that dazzle the world. Are you making the most of your potential? Are you turning it from lead into gold? Are you an alchemist, or one of the unenlightened on your knees to a fake God? Abrahamism destroys potential; Illuminism and meritocracy are all about transforming all human potential into golden achievements. Earth will become a 24-carat golden nugget, the supreme treasure of the universe.


"There is naught in heaven or upon earth that is not in man. And God who dwelleth in Heaven, He also is in Man."




The Illuminati want to release human divinity. That is the Great Work - the magnum opus - of which the alchemists spoke.



* * * * *



"Everything of any importance is founded on mathematics."

--Robert Heinlein



The following diagram is one of the most important you will ever see:








It contains seven of the nine most significant numbers. 1, -1, i, -i, and 0 are plainly visible. The circle contains the number pi and the circle is a symbol of the number infinity. The absent numbers are e (the base of natural logarithms and from which the exponential function is obtained) and the golden ratio (phi).


(Many mathematicians consider Euler's formula as the most beautiful in mathematics eiπ + 1 = 0 because it expresses a relationship between five of the most crucial numbers in a supremely elegant and compact manner.)   


Consider how the diagram is constructed:


1) It begins with zero, the origin, a dimensionless point. Extend that dimensionless point to the east to make a one-dimensional line of positive numbers. Extend it to the west to cater for negative numbers. The positive and negative numbers make up the so-called "real" number line. Why aren't the real numbers complete? Because if we perform the mathematical operation of squaring the real numbers, half of the universe vanishes since all of the negatives become positive. There is a catastrophic flaw in the real numbers. How is this remedied?


2) We extend zero to the north to make a one-dimensional line of positive imaginary numbers, and we extend it to the south to make a one-dimensional line of negative imaginary numbers. We have gone from a one-dimensional line of real numbers to a two-dimensional plane of complex numbers (complex numbers comprise a real part and an imaginary part). Now what happens when we square this universe? The negative real numbers disappear as before, but now they are replaced by the squared imaginary numbers since the square of an imaginary number is negative. But if the imaginary numbers have become real negative numbers, what takes the place of the imaginary numbers? Haven't they now disappeared en masse too? No, because they have square roots too (of complex numbers), indicated by the blue dots in the above diagram.


So, in terms of the complex plane, we now have completeness. But if we describe the complex plane as an x-axis and a perpendicular x(imaginary)-axis (xi), what about the y and z equivalents (yi and zi)?


3) So, we do exactly the same thing for the y and z axes. Thus we get a six dimensional space x, xi, y, yi, z, zi that we can designate as 6D(3r3i) where r stands for real numbers and i for imaginary numbers. This is our complete mathematical space, stable under any mathematical operation. Our previous mathematical designation of 4Di was wrong for the simple reason that we had included only one imaginary axis rather than matching up one to each of the x, y and z-axes. 4Di was short of two imaginary dimensions, hence incomplete in the two directions where they were absent. 4Di had the right shape because in the context of calculating the distance between any two points, it allowed three zones to be generated: real distances, imaginary distances and null distances. These three zones constitute the essence of Einstein's special theory of relativity. But they are so much more than that. They are the basis of God, the mind, the soul, the afterlife. The "null zone" - outside space and time - is the province of religion. The "imaginary zone" - inside space and time - is the province of conventional science. The "real zone" - where the speed of light is always exceeded - can be considered a kind of mirror image of the imaginary zone.


Consider the following properties of entities moving at subluminal speeds (below light speed) and those at superluminal speeds (above light speed): 




a) Can never be accelerated to lightspeed.   


b) Would need infinite energy to attain light speed (and would gain infinite mass).


c) Travel forward through time.                                  


d) Time runs more slowly as lightspeed is approached. Distances shrink.


e) Time runs forward faster and faster as zero speed is approached.

f) Cannot escape a black hole.


g) As they lose energy, they approach zero speed.


h) Go slower and slower until they lose all kinetic energy.


i) As they lose energy, they travel slower through space and faster (forwards) through time.


j) As they gain energy, they travel faster through space and slower (forwards) through time.


k) In their own frame of reference, they have real mass, experience real distances and real time. (In contrast, photons that exist in the null zone have zero mass and experience zero distances and zero time.)




a) Can never be slowed down to lightspeed.


b) Would need infinite energy to attain light speed (and would gain infinite mass).


c) Travel backward through time.


d) Time runs more slowly backwards as lightspeed is approached. Distances shrink.


e) Time runs backward faster and faster as infinite speed is approached.


f) Can escape a black hole.


g) As they lose energy, they approach infinite speed.


h) Go faster and faster until they lose all kinetic energy.


i) As they lose energy, they travel faster through space and faster (backwards) through time.


j) As they gain energy, they travel slower through space and slower (backwards) through time.


k) In their own frame of reference, they have imaginary mass, experience imaginary distances and imaginary time. (In contrast, photons that exist in the null zone have zero mass, and experience zero distances and zero time.)


Neither subluminal nor superluminal particles can cross the light speed barrier i.e. a superluminal particle can never slow down to light speed, and can never cross into the subluminal speed zone. By the same token, a subluminal particle can never speed up to light speed and can never cross into the superluminal speed zone.


Thus we can imagine the speed of light to be equivalent to the surface of a mirror, and the superluminal zone to be the reflection of the subliminal zone, where everything is back to front - particles lose energy as they speed up rather than gaining energy and time goes backwards rather than forwards.


It is impossible for anything to pass through the mirror to the reflection. And is a reflection real in any case? Or is the superluminal zone simply describing what we would get if we ran the movie of life backwards, erasing everything that ever took place?





* * * * *



So, 6 is the "magic" number that describes the minimum number of dimensions required to provide the framework for complete mathematics.


Six is one of the most special of numbers. It is the first "perfect" number (its three divisors 1, 2 and 3 add up to 6). Also, 1x2x3 = 6. Also, 6 is the number of the first three levels of the tetraktys, and the fourth level may be considered the cosmos that is constructed from those fundamental upper levels.


In an Order 6 magic square, each column, row, and major diagonal adds up to 111. All six columns added together equal a certain esoteric number of immense power, as do all six of the rows added together, as do all the numbers between 1 and 36.

The number in question is none other than 666.


Order 6 Magic Square

6   32  3    34  35  1

7   11  27  28  8    30

24 14  16  15  23  19

13 20  22  21  17  18

25 29  10  9    26  12

36 5    33  4    2    31



Apart from being one of the numbers associated with Abraxas, 666 is the number of light, of the sun, and of Lucifer. Now you know why Christians call it the Number of the Beast. Something of an irony given that they are the ones who choose to worship the Devil - Yahweh/Satan.


One of the earliest and most potent symbols of the Illuminati was the one imprinted on the gold signet ring of Solomon, his great ring of power, said to be imbued with the highest magic. This symbol is the so-called "Seal of Solomon", based on the hexagram, the six-pointed star. Note that the Seal features a circle around the hexagram, the circle being the symbol of both "nothing" and its twin, infinity. The Seal also contains a central hexagon (another symbol of 6) and six satellite equilateral triangles (symbols of 3). And it contains 6 individual monads. Above all, it contains two large, interpenetrating equilateral triangles that comprise the hexagram. The triangle pointing upwards is the "masculine" one, while the one pointing downwards is the matching feminine one. Male and female coming together creates the cosmos.







This is exactly like the 3D domain of real numbers coming together with the 3D domain of imaginary numbers to form the 6D cosmos. The Seal of Solomon is the perfect symbol of the 6D universe, with the real and imaginary numbers fully interpenetrating each other.



The six lines of the hexagram, the six apexes of the hexagram and the six dots (monads) make up 666. It was the Seal of Solomon that the Christians found so abominable. It was identified with Simon Magus, the true Christ whom the Christians regarded as the Antichrist/Beast, and whom they believed would return to the world prior to the "true" Second Coming. In those early Christian times, members of the Illuminati often marked their right hand with the sign of the Seal.


The Book of Revelation: 13:16-18:


16   He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads,


17  and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.


18  Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man: His number is 666.



(Note that in the Middle Ages the great symbol of the Seal became associated with Judaism in what is now known as the "Star of David". Before that, the menorah, the seven-branched candelabrum, was the unambiguous, quintessential symbol of Judaism. The Jews have now completely hijacked the hexagram symbol, meaning that it is rarely used by the Illuminati in the present day. It is because of the links between the Seal of Solomon and the Star of David that the Illuminati were accused of being secret Jews by those clueless people who understood nothing of the history of the respective symbols.


The 6D(3r3i) mathematical space is based on two sets of complementary dimensions, three real and three imaginary, inextricably intertwined with each other. "3" is of course another supremely special number, the number of the trinity, the triad, the dialectic (thesis, antithesis and synthesis). It is the first male number and represents harmony since it equals 1 (the monad = unity, the number of Reason) plus 2 (the dyad = diversity, otherness, the first female number) i.e. 3, the triad equals harmony = unity + diversity. And 6 = the number of Creation since it equals the first female number (2) plus the first male number (3) + 1 (the supreme monad).

So, if the three real dimensions (designated by x, y and z) are at right angles to each other and create an edgeless cube that extends infinitely in all directions to completely fill "real space", where do the three imaginary dimensions (which we may label as xi, yi and zi) fit in? There's no room! 


But if we say that the y-axis is at right angles to the x-axis and the xi-axis is also at right angles to the x-axis in the same plane then we are effectively saying that there is a certain relationship between the y-axis and the xi-axis. We can extend this thinking to show that the z-axis is related to the yi-axis and the x-axis to the zi-axis:


The mapping of imaginary axes to real axes:


xi <=> y; yi <=> z; zi <=> x


In other words, we can imagine the three imaginary dimensions being fitted exactly over the three real dimensions, but at a different orientation according to the mapping we have just described.


It is an arrangement that is both breathtakingly simple and breathtakingly complex. In some sense all real numbers of one dimension (e.g. the x-axis) are also imaginary numbers of another dimension (e.g. the zi-axis). Thus all numbers are dual entities, both real and imaginary, and it is this duality that underpins the two "separate" dimensions that we call space and time.


Astonishing as it may seem, the essence of Einstein's special theory or relativity is contained within the simple diagram we showed earlier.


Consider the following pairs of coordinates P1 and P2, where the second coordinate of P1 and P2 is an imaginary number:


a) P1 (2, 3); P2 (5,5)


b) P1 (4,1); P2 (6,7)


c) P1 (1,1); P2 (6,6)



For a), the distance (d) between P1 and P2 is, using Pythagoras's Theorem: 


d2 = (5-2)2 + (5-3)i2 = 9 - 4 = 5, so d = + √5 or - √5 (since a quadratic equation has two roots, one positive and one negative). 


For b) d2 = (6-4)2 + (7-1)i2 = 4 - 36 = -32, so d = + (√32)i or - (√32)i


For c) d2 = (6-1)2 + (6-1)i2 = 25 - 25 = 0, so d = + 0 or - 0 = 0


So, the distance between any two points in our diagram will be either (+ real number) or (- real number) or (+ imaginary number) or (- imaginary number) or zero. Nothing else is possible.


If we flood this 2D(1r1i) "world" with formless energy, some will flow into the domain of positive real numbers, some into the domain of negative real numbers, some into the domain of positive imaginary numbers, some into the domain of negative imaginary numbers, and some into the zero zone. Nothing else is possible. 


The zero zone is the domain of massless particles such as photons. All distances in this zone are zero.


Any points that lie on lines that strike the x-axis at an angle of 45 degrees (or 90 + 45 = 135 degrees, or 180 + 45 = 225 degrees, or 270 + 45 = 315 degrees) will exist in the zero zone. Even if P1 is (0,0) and P2 (infinity, infinity), the distance between the two points will still be zero. In other words, a particle could travel from P1 (0,0) to P2 (infinity, infinity) and yet not travel any distance! (hence it would take no time). Such particles are exhibiting one of the central paradoxes of existence: they move and yet don't get anywhere since they always cover zero distance. They could traverse every point in the universe in no time without covering any distance. Such is the supreme mystery of the zero zone.  


Note that the whole diagram could be covered with 45, 135, 225 and 315-degree lines, meaning that every point in existence is connected to the zero zone. The whole cosmos has a link to the zero zone. Here, everything is interconnected outside space and time.


Nothing can pass from the real zone to the imaginary zone because the zero zone is an impenetrable barrier between the two zones. You can only enter it if you have zero mass.


So, this simple diagram with one real axis and one imaginary axis is a perfect model of the mathematics of special relativity. If the 2D(1r1i1) world (corresponding to the x and x-imaginary axes) is simply scaled up (to accommodate the equivalent y and z 2D worlds), we obtain the full 6D(3r3i) cosmos. But the principles remain exactly the same and everything that is true of the 2D space is true of the 6D space.


Hence our simple 2D world of one real and one imaginary axis shows how a zone can be created within that world in which everything is linked to everything else by zero distance. From this unique perspective, the whole cosmos is in fact a zero-dimensional singularity like that at the centre of a black hole or the Big Bang. And yet this singularity exists within a vast cosmos where any two points can also be separated by anything other than zero distance.


In one and the same cosmos, we have everything separate and everything connected. Both statements are simultaneously true. So much for Aristotelian logic. Now you see why only dialectical logic suffices in these extreme conditions. Imagine holding a needle sideways in front of you. You clearly see its whole length. Then rotate the needle until you only see its point. The cosmos operates the same way. From some angles you see it as a substantial object, yet there is an angle where it becomes almost invisible - a singularity. Everything depends on the angle. From the viewpoint of the needlepoint, it is connected to everything! This domain, outside space and time, is where our afterlife is guaranteed. The part of us - our mind/soul - that has the perspective of the needle tip cannot die. It is immortal. It is linked to everything else. It is linked to God. 


At this very instant you are linked to everything that has ever been, and everyone who has ever lived, and to God. You are in direct contact with any of your loved ones who have died. The only reason you don't know it is that your consciousness is trapped in a certain time-space perspective. When you achieve gnosis - enlightenment - your perspective instantly switches to that of the needle point and you are at one with the cosmos.


Can you begin to see the light? It's all in the mathematics. Mathematics is reality. Mathematics guarantees that part of us - our essence, not the mortal part of space and time - is immortal. If you accept Einstein's special theory of relativity you have virtually accepted the existence of an afterlife, of souls, of God. Isn't that amazing? Atheistic scientists have wilfully ignored the astonishing ramifications of one of their own key theories. They are DETERMINED not to see God, such is their slavish devotion to materialism - which has become their strange, hopeless religion.






The Profound Mystery of Time



If time is grounded in imaginary space and there are three dimensions of imaginary space then doesn't that mean that time is three-dimensional rather than the single dimensional arrow of time that we experience? We can never travel backwards or sideways or up and down in time…we just go forward.


But is that true? Physicists say that superluminal particles would be perceived by us to go backwards in time, so, in theory at least, it's possible for time to have a reverse direction. But Einstein's equations of special relativity actually indicate that superluminal particles would experience "imaginary" time, but no scientist knows what that is. There's actually a huge problem with defining what time is in scientific equations, and what its negative might be. Is "negative" time (t), simply -t compared with t? But what about imaginary time and negative imaginary time: it and -it? Where do they fit in? And what if time is actually complex and has a real part and an imaginary part? What then? Science doesn't have a clue about any of this. Time is always handled as an ill-defined "bodge"; it seems to work (more by accident than design), but there's no firm theoretical foundation for it.


Why does it work at all? Time is regarded as a one-dimensional scalar quantity. It has a magnitude and, in our experience, it goes one way only - forward. But consider distance. A straight line between two points is a one-dimensional scalar. But if we have drawn a straight line in a 3D space then its two ends may have x, y and z coordinates such as (3, 4, 7) and (10, 2, 8) i.e. it is now actually a vector (a directional line) in 3D space and not just any old line. But, in real life, its magnitude may be all that really matters to us. If we have to walk ten kilometres from one place to another, it is the distance travelled that will matter to us. We won't be aware of how the x, y and z coordinates constantly change as we move; the vector elements are almost irrelevant. Obviously, we need to be walking in the right direction to reach our desired destination, but once that is established, it is the magnitude that preoccupies us. Time is treated as a scalar but is actually a vector, exactly like distance. We just don't notice its vector aspects.


In 6D(3r3i), it is possible to go forwards/backwards, left/right, up/down. Exactly the same is true of imaginary space, hence of time. In 6D(3r3i) space, positive and negative space, and imaginary and negative imaginary space, can all be defined. By the same token, positive and negative time, and imaginary and negative imaginary time can all be defined. A proper scientific theory of everything needs to be able to clearly distinguish between all of these different cases.


Many scientific equations involve taking the square root, but a square root always has a positive and negative solution for both real and imaginary numbers. Often, science only accepts one solution as real: the positive root of a real number. Everything else is discarded as unreal. Yet Einstein's special theory of relativity and the quantum mechanical treatment of "antimatter" show how wrong this approach is. The world is enormously more complex. It's no wonder that scientists haven't got a clue what dark matter and dark energy are since, on the whole, they have rejected all of the "unreal" solutions where these mysterious entities are unquestionably lurking.


The cosmos is not ruled by real and imaginary numbers (the extreme cases), but by the numbers in-between: the complex numbers that have both a real and imaginary component. Science, again by accident more than design, has found equations that actually deal effectively with complex numbers, but scientists are unaware of why their equations actually work. After all, they have no idea what the core dimensionality of the cosmos is. According to relativitists, the cosmos is a 4D spacetime continuum, while M Theory posits 11 dimensions.  Is it any wonder quantum mechanics can't be reconciled with the general theory of relativity (concerning gravity)? How can the two theories be blended if they can't define something as basic as dimensionality? We have no doubt at all that if relativists and M-theorists both start using 6D(3r3i), many of the difficulties in merging the two theories will vanish.    


Another point worth mentioning is what we mean by "going back in time". If I truly travel back in time by, say, ten years then it means that I go back to who I was and where I was ten years ago, and everything that happened to me in the interim is erased. However, most people think that time travel means going back to the past but as they are now. The two situations are entirely different.


In the former case, time has truly been reversed. In the second case, it hasn't been reversed at all because the time traveller's consciousness is still GOING FORWARD in time.


Going forward in time actually means that INFORMATION always increases. To go back in time would mean to erase INFORMATION and that can never happen. This is why we experience time as always going forward even though it is actually three dimensional like space. It is INFORMATION FLOW that has only one direction in time. Our consciousness, hence our experience of time, is linked to this information flow, not to time itself. We can't go back in time in terms of reversing time (erasing information). If we could experience the time of ten years ago, but with our present knowledge, then we would still be going forward in time in terms of information. Such is the mystery of time.


Time needs to be completely re-examined in philosophical, religious and scientific terms. The 6D(3r3i) paradigm provides the only mathematically, scientifically and philosophically coherent framework in which to define and analyze time.


As Neitzche said, It's time for a revaluation of all values!





* * * * *



The Profound Mystery of Schrödinger's Quantum Mechanical Wave Equation


Schrödinger's wave equation is one of the most important in physics. If you look it up, you will discover that it has the imaginary number right at its heart. What's that there for? How does it make any sense in the "real" world (of real numbers)?


No physicist actually knows why it's there. They simply know that it works. But we know the reason - it's precisely because of 6D(3r3i) space. The imaginary dimensions are every bit as "real" and important as the real dimensions. Quantum mechanical particles need to be treated as 6D complex numbers (with real and imaginary parts). Schrödinger's equation achieves this by incorporating the imaginary number along with real components, but Schrödinger, and every other scientist, has never been able to account for why the imaginary number is essential to quantum particles. We have now given the reason - 6D(3r3i) complete mathematics requires it.


All quantum "weirdness" stems from the fact that these tiny, almost massless, particles are whizzing around in 6D(3r3i) space rather than 3D real space, and are fluttering in and out of the null zone that exists outside space and time (hence these particles can seem to be in two or more places at once). This is the "physical" model of what is actually taking place at the quantum level, a subject that has hitherto baffled all scientists, who have never been able to form any kind of picture of what is taking place. Once again, 6D(3r3i) provides the decisive breakthrough.


The famous Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox concerning instantaneous communication between correlated particles separated by enormous distances is explained with consummate ease: the particles are linked outside space and time via the null zone which links all points in the cosmos. Simple stuff! Yet it has defied the greatest scientific minds for decades.


M-theory will never work because scientists are groping their way forward without actually knowing what they're doing and without having any logical conceptual framework in which to work. They are continually changing their ideas to suit the latest experimental data, rather than logically working out what NEEDS to be true.


Over and over again, scientists manage to find good equations, but they never really know why they work, just that they do. That's why there are so many rival interpretations of what quantum mechanics actually means in terms of reality. That debate should end thanks to the 6D(3r3i) space of complete mathematics.


The complete mathematical space 6D(3r3i) provides the framework for the Grand Unified Theory of Everything. Everything that can happen, happens within this space. One way of thinking about the cosmos is to consider a single point and its relationship with the infinite number of other points in the cosmos. The point we choose will be separated by a certain distance from each of these infinite other points. There are only three possible types of distance it can experience: a "real" separation, an "imaginary" separation" or a null (zero) separation. That's it. Nothing else can happen. The same is true for every point in the cosmos. If we want the simplest possible way of thinking about the cosmos it is this: energy moves from point to point and as it does so it crosses a real distance, an imaginary distance or no distance at all. This staggeringly simple model describes everything that can ever happen in the cosmos from a scientific standpoint. All the complexity we see around us is simply the manifestation of what happens when energy, spread across an infinity of points, moves around from one point to another within that infinite matrix - the ultimate cosmic game of Musical Chairs except no chairs are ever removed and the music never stops.


The null zone - where distinct points are separated by no distance - is the key to the whole edifice. Here, and here alone, time and space do not exist. Dimensionality disappears. Movement occurs, and yet no distance is ever traversed. Everything here is interconnected, interpenetrating, flowing over and into each other endlessly. This is the extraordinary domain of the mind, the soul, the afterlife, God. It is the dazzling domain of light. 


It is this null zone that underlies the Buddhist conception of nirvana - the underlying Oneness where everything is interconnected and where the individual is "extinguished". He enters into union with Zero, with nullity, so to speak. And also with infinity since the null zone is as strongly associated with infinity as its twin zero. So, Buddhists must be congratulated. Nirvana is certainly an enlightened concept that expresses much of the essence of the null zone. Equally, the Hindu concept of Brahman, the universal soul, the eternal, infinite, immanent, transcendent reality and ground of all being can be equated with the null zone, so Hindus too must be congratulated. Nirvana and Brahman both lie beyond the "veil of illusion", which we can equate with the r > 0 physical cosmos, the cosmos where distances between points are real or imaginary, but not zero. As for Taoism, the Tao is the ultimate creative principle of the universe in which all things are unified and connected: again, this is strikingly like the null zone.


Buddhism and Hinduism, if they dropped their allegiance to the idiotic concept of karma, would be truly enlightened, and close to the fundamental truth of existence. Taoism is arguably one step closer already to Illumination since it avoids karmic thinking. The Abrahamists with their idea of a creator God external to the universe rather than at the centre of it are the forces of darkness, utterly estranged from the light.


It's time for an end to all the mumbo jumbo, hocus pocus and mysticism. We have provided, as we promised we would, the framework in which all the issues of religion, philosophy, science and mathematics can be treated in a comprehensive, unified, integrated manner. Science and religion do not describe two separate universes, and "never the twain shall meet" is a false notion. There is only one universe. Science and religion come at the same problem from two different angles, but they are dealing with exactly the same problem, not a completely separate one. If religion does not or cannot specify the mathematical and scientific framework in which it is said to manifest itself then it's not worth a cent. It's literally nothing but madness and delusion, into which human fantasy will flow unopposed, completely disconnected from reality and truth.


Only the framework we have provided allows a proper consideration of religion. Only this framework links it indissolubly with science, philosophy and mathematics. Religion has nothing whatsoever to do with faith. Religion is a special type of science that operates fully within the scientific framework. We have shown that religion is the province of the null zone where time and space do not apply - where everything endures forever i.e. the part of us that exists in the null zone cannot die; we have a guaranteed afterlife.


Descartes described the mind as being without "extension". In the null zone, we have exactly that extensionless domain of mind. Panpsychism asserts that mind is everywhere. We have seen that every point in existence is indeed connected to the null zone, so mind is omni-present. Enlightened religions talk of everything being interconnected. We have demonstrated that this is true within the null zone. Enlightened religions say that we can enter into union with God. Again, the null zone provides this precise possibility. All psychic and paranormal phenomena are mediated through this "magic" zone of cosmic interconnectivity. We haven't even begun to tap into the extraordinary powers that reside within this zone, that can convert us into gods.


Have we not provided the entry point to all the mysteries of the cosmos? Have we not provided the Solomon Key?


The information presented here speaks for itself. Illumination is the only truly valid religion. It is the only religion based on science, mathematics, philosophy, logic, and reason. It is a religion of knowledge, not faith. The Eastern religions are pale imitations. The Abrahamic religions are preposterous. Atheism is the quasi-religious worship of scientific materialism. Agnosticism is for people who are paralyzed by doubt, indecision and lack of knowledge.


To access the truth, you don't have to take any "leap of faith". You simply have to think.


The adherents of Illumination are incredibly loyal. Why? Because they have at last found what they were always looking for - the one, true religion that avoided all the ridiculous bullshit of all the rest. It is not a "finished" religion. It's a dialectical religion, always making itself more perfect, always embracing new knowledge and new insights. It is never out of date. It is not frozen in time like Abrahamism which gets less and less relevant with every passing day. All the followers of Illumination can contribute to its development. There are no prophets and no holy texts. Ideas are adopted according to their merit. Illuminism is all about meritocracy. The smartest, most meritorious make the biggest contributions.


 Illuminism has no connection whatsoever with faith. We don't expect anyone to "believe" a single word of what we have said. Our religion has no time for those who cling to Holy Scripture and the words of dead prophets. All faith-based religious statements are intrinsically absurd and quintessentially UNBELIEVABLE. That's the supreme irony of the Abrahamic religions. They are all about belief, yet no one with a brain and power of rational thought could ever believe them.


We have presented Illuminism as a set of philosophical, religious, mathematical and scientific statements. Slowly but surely we have constructed the edifice that everyone can now see for themselves. We have quoted no holy books of Illuminism that you must accept without question; we have quoted no prophets of Illuminism whom you must believe utterly or suffer eternal hellfire.


Every statement we have made is capable of being analyzed and challenged. If you think you can improve Illuminism, go for it! Illuminism is a dialectical religion; it is perfecting itself, just as the cosmos itself is. That is the fundamental nature of the dialectic.


The following are the essential points of Illuminism, the logical premises by which it stands or falls:


Q. What is the arche, the fundamental substance of existence? 


A. It is "minded", formless, striving, dimensionless energy - Pure Will. Since it is dimensionless, it does not experience the "mortal" dimensions of space and time, hence is immortal. It has always existed and it will always exist. It is existence itself. It can never not exist. It accords with the First law of Thermodynamics that energy can neither be created nor destroyed. It cannot be brought into existence and nor can it be removed from existence; it has simply always existed. But, crucially, it can be transformed. Its quality can be improved until it's perfect.


Q. How does the formless arche attain form?


A. Through the only thing that can provide absolute order, organization, system, stability, pattern, logic - Mathematics, the queen of the sciences, the sacred science. Nothing else exists that can accomplish what mathematics can. It is the ONLY candidate for providing cosmic form, law and organized behaviour.


Q. In that case, where does mathematics come from? How is the cosmos able to understand mathematics?


A. Mathematics is in fact the surest proof of cosmic mind and intelligence. It is absurd to propose, as materialistic science does, that mindless matter is miraculously able to organize itself in a host of complex ways according to the "laws of physics". No scientist has ever explained where the laws of physics come from and how they are possible. Why those laws and not others? Why any laws at all? Why not eternal randomness and chaos? Why should matter be subject to law at all? Why should matter have any connection with mathematics? In fact, the cosmos "learned" mathematics over many eons by nothing more sophisticated than trial and error, evolutionary natural selection and dialectical progression: the principles that have guided all existence since time immemorial.


The cosmos in itself - dimensionless energy - continually "spilled" out of itself into dimensionality. It is the nature of Will never to be "contained". It will always try to reach beyond itself. This was a haphazard process since dimensionality is mathematical and mathematics did not yet exist in any coherent way. Each time Will entered the domain of partial, incomplete dimensionality, it learned some new item of mathematical information. After countless "experiments", the Will had learned to count and understand geometrical shapes. Not in any conscious sense - more like the ultimate autistic savant. Its grasp of mathematics was strictly intuitive. Mathematics was the first language ever learned by the cosmos; it is the fundamental language of existence. It is the basis of all order and thought, of logic and reason. Of mind. Of consciousness. It is the essential framework providing the categories of understanding. It is the sine qua non.


 Mathematics can be considered as the true Platonic Forms: eternal, perfect, unchanging, existing in a permanent ideal state to which the whole cosmos has access. They were not given to the cosmos as perfect Forms; rather they dialectically evolved and when they reached their Omega Point they were subject to no further change; they had achieved perfection and completion. Plato's domain of perfect Forms is the domain of mathematics and it is now hard-wired into the cosmos (we might say that this domain is stored in the core memory of the cosmic mind, the Read-Only memory, to use a computing term.) The Will learned through its endless experimentation that only "complete" mathematics is stable and provides a proper framework for organization and order: all of Plato's mathematical Forms must be used, not an incomplete subset. And so came the miraculous moment when the r = 0 dimensionless cosmos of mind deliberately poured itself out into the r > 0 dimensional cosmos, according to a perfect intuitive understanding of complete mathematics as eternal Platonic Forms. Formlessness flowed through the domain of mathematical Forms and emerged in the myriad forms we observe in Nature. Plato's mathematical Forms are the origins of the laws of physics that shape the world we observe around us. They dictated the creation of the material world. This supreme, defining event was none other than the Big Bang itself.


Q. What would you say is the purpose of existence?


A. It is essential for the cosmos to externalize itself, to physicalize itself, to alienate itself, in order to dialectically overcome that alienation and reach self-consciousness. The teleological purpose of the cosmos is precisely that: to attain self-consciousness, to actualize all of the latent powers, potential and possibilities of raw mind. No scientist has ever explained how mind originates in dead, mindless matter. The truth is that the arche is alive and minded and always has been. There is no dualism between life and death, between mind and non-mind, between consciousness and non-consciousness. Everything exists on a continuum of actualization of life, mind and consciousness. Humans have more of it (more actualization) than plants, which have more of it than rocks which have more of it than interstellar dust. The cosmos is based on monism, not dualism. To be precise, it is a dialectical monism. All dualistic systems - those based on two radically different concepts such as mind/matter, death/life, consciousness/non-consciousness - all fail for exactly the same reason: two unlike substances cannot interact.


Existence is a cosmic equation permanently solving itself. It can give a final answer to itself - it can create meaning - only when it becomes conscious of itself. Human beings - smart, rational ones, at least - are dimly conscious of mathematical reality, but full consciousness becomes possible only when a mind attains gnosis and achieves "God consciousness." God - perfection - is the meaning of the eternal mathematical equation. It is God who decides to restart the equation and begin the search for perfection all over again in the process known as "divine suicide".


Existence consists of infinite cycles of moving from total potential to total actualization with endless possible ways of getting there. That's all it can ever do. It is a perfection generator, yet perfection is fleeting. It soon becomes boring and hence imperfect, so must destroy itself.


Q. So if there is an infinite number zeros/souls/monads, how can they come together to create one God who then has the ability to commit the "divine suicide?"


The maximum possible actualization of reality would be for every monad to progress from total potential to total actualization i.e. for every monad to become God. Now think of a black hole. If a dying star is sufficiently big, it reaches a point of IRREVERSIBLE collapse and the whole star vanishes into a singularity. For a nuclear bomb to work, you must create a critical mass of nuclear material in order to generate the explosive chain reaction. Another useful concept is that of a phase change. At 0 degrees Celsius, liquid water changes phase to ice and at 100 degrees it changes phase to vapor. The same sorts of ideas apply to the God universe. Once you reach a critical - FINITE - number of God-monads, you trigger an unstoppable chain reaction across the universe. The universe undergoes an irreversible transformation and changes phase to pure mind, pure divinity (to the God of Gods - meaning that the whole universe of Gods operates as one God). So, an omega point will definitely occur in an infinite system, though only a finite trigger is required. (The reason is that the creation of Gods already bridges the gap between the finite and infinite since humans are finite and Gods are infinite.)





* * * * *



Mathematical dialectical monism based on complete mathematics provides the answer to Leibniz's requirement that the best account of the world is the one that is "simplest in hypotheses and the richest in phenomena." Complete mathematics achieves precisely this. Nothing else could accomplish this with the same simplicity, consistency, efficiency and elegance. In fact nothing else is even conceivable.


Complete mathematics also addresses Leibniz's fundamental question of why there is something rather than nothing. "Nothing" - zero - is something. It is a mathematical number, one of the complete set; in fact at the very origin of the complete set. Complete mathematics asserts that all numbers have equal "reality", hence zero is as real, has as much existence, as any other number. Zero can be defined as 1/∞. So, already, we can see that it is something and not nothing. In fact, any finite number divided by infinity equals zero. Zero is the twin of infinity - the other side of the coin, the flip side, the inverse - and contains all numbers.


The question why is there something rather than nothing is really an implicit acknowledgement of the stance of scientific materialism that dimensionless existence is impossible. To an idealist who rejects materialism, the question would be reformulated as: is it possible for mind/thinking not to exist? Could there ever have been a time when there was no thought? If so, what caused the first thought and indeed what was the first thought? And if something caused the first thought then the precursor of thought must always have existed. But if thought or its precursor has always existed then "something" has always existed.


Pure nothingness is quite simply impossible. And when we understand the indissoluble relationship between nothing and infinity, we see why. Everything is implicit in nothing. Infinity can pour forth from nothing. "Nothing" is defined with regard to the finite divided by the infinite i.e. it is finite "something" divided by infinite "something". It is not defined with regard to nothing. No definition of nothing can ever be formulated. It is an impossible state. It cannot exist. Pure nothingness is outside the scope of complete mathematics, hence cannot have "reality". Scientists who talk of a "free lunch" universe assert that the overall energy of the universe is zero because the positive mass-energy of the cosmos is exactly balanced by the negative gravitational energy i.e. something came from nothing but only because something is always implicit in nothing, and because somethings can have opposite signs and cancel each other out, leaving zero on the one hand and an infinity of balanced energy on the other.


The cosmos at the "scientific" level may be considered as energy moving through a complete mathematical space where the distance between any two points can be zero, real or imaginary (positive or negative). The zero zone, the "null" zone, is outside space and time. The imaginary zone is what relativity describes as "timelike", and the real zone as "spacelike". We exist in the timelike zone where no speed ever exceeds light speed. In the spacelike zone, no speed can ever fall below light speed. But note the fundamental asymmetry: subluminal speeds go from zero to the finite speed of light (as measured in space-time reference frames), while superluminal speeds go from the finite speed of light all the way to infinity. All symmetry-breaking phenomena deserve the most careful study because it is they that make the cosmos what it is and not just some eternal cancelling out of symmetrical properties where nothing significant would ever evolve. Asymmetry is essential to evolution and teleology. 



We have given you Solomon's key to the secrets of the cosmos. Use it wisely. Use it well. Use it to become all that you have it in you to be. Maximize your potential. Be great. Be divine.